chore: add active users counter per rate limiter duration

[nadezhdapopovaa]

Description:
Add counter for active users based on the rate limiter duration period.

Related issue(s):

Fixes #3151

Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[github-actions]

🚨 Memory Leak Detected 🚨

A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled validates enforcement of request id. This may impact the application's performance and stability.

Details

📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊

GC Type: MarkSweepCompact
Cost: 27,888 ms

Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):

• Total Heap Size: increased with 1.46 MB
• Total Heap Size Executable: no changes
• Total Physical Size: decreased with 348.16 KB
• Total Available Size: decreased with 4.20 MB
• Total Global Handles Size: no changes
• Used Global Handles Size: decreased with 64.00 bytes
• Used Heap Size: decreased with 3.44 MB
• Heap Size Limit: no changes
• Malloced Memory: no changes
• External Memory: no changes
• Peak Malloced Memory: no changes

Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):

• Old Space:

  • Space Size: increased with 1.84 MB
  • Space Used Size: increased with 2.08 MB
  • Space Available Size: decreased with 7.09 MB
  • Physical Space Size: increased with 1.84 MB

• Large Object Space:

  • Space Size: increased with 835.58 KB
  • Space Used Size: increased with 813.50 KB
  • Space Available Size: no changes
  • Physical Space Size: increased with 835.58 KB

Recommendations

Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.

[github-actions]

Test Results

 19 files  + 2  272 suites  +42   34m 0s ⏱️ + 4m 59s
607 tests ± 0  601 ✅  -  2  4 💤 ±0  2 ❌ +2 
699 runs  +76  693 ✅ +74  4 💤 ±0  2 ❌ +2 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 127fc31. ± Comparison against base commit 264d2cb.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[natanasow]

LGTM

[Nana-EC]

Good change but not sure it's at the right level and might have side effects

[ebadiere]

Is there a way to have this managed by the metrics service?

[Nana-EC]

I think we've got to an agreement on the metric choice now

[Nana-EC]

LG

[quiet-node]

Great work! LGTM but left some questions and a suggestion

[quiet-node]

LGTM! One thing can be addressed in follow PR.

Great work! 🙌🏼

[quiet-node]

LGTM

[quiet-node]

LGTM 1 question

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
4 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.83%. Comparing base (264d2cb) to head (127fc31).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
packages/relay/src/lib/eth.ts	70.00%	0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3150      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.85%   77.83%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          66       66              
  Lines        4453     4457       +4     
  Branches      993      998       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         3467     3469       +2     
  Misses        613      613              
- Partials      373      375       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
config-service	98.14% <ø> (ø)
relay	78.56% <70.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
server	83.28% <ø> (ø)
ws-server	36.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
packages/relay/src/lib/eth.ts	71.04% <70.00%> (-0.10%)	⬇️