You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Depending on how the suite of tools may be integrated in Pema, merging can be achieved through bbmerge, but additional steps (trimming, adapter removal) may also be handled with the same package in a very fast and efficient way.
Thank you for considering adding the tool, it appears to handle better than pandaseq the merging step of fully overlapping reads (insert size equal to read length cases)!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
BBmap is available here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/
it has been published in PloS One:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657622/
and adopted by a wide community, including the JGI (here is a guide in their website for bbmerge: https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/software-tools/bbtools/bb-tools-user-guide/bbmerge-guide/)
Depending on how the suite of tools may be integrated in Pema, merging can be achieved through bbmerge, but additional steps (trimming, adapter removal) may also be handled with the same package in a very fast and efficient way.
The Bbmmerge developer doesnot recommend trimming prior to merging, though, similarly to a growing number of researchers apparently (eg https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1874778721000805).
Thank you for considering adding the tool, it appears to handle better than pandaseq the merging step of fully overlapping reads (insert size equal to read length cases)!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: