-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 777
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
edit content field, removed type field from yml credits #3687
Conversation
Want to review this pull request? Take a look at this documentation for a step by step guide! From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
|
Review ETA: 11/1/22 7:30pm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fantastic job, @luiderek! You took care of all the action items without making any visible changes to the website. One thing I've been doing when coming up with a branch name is choosing the number of the dependency (in this case, #2856) rather than the issue it's being tracked by (#2775) so it's clear to reviewers that I am only managing the dependency.
Yeah, I realized I put in the wrong issue # for my commit / branchname after making the pull request (i had a lot of different tabs open), but wasn't sure if undoing the pull request was the right move in this situation. Just gotta be more careful. |
Gotcha. I would've also committed to this PR and maybe included a small note for my oopsie. I'd be curious to know what the leads would do! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, it looks like renaming the branch kills it. Should I restore it or just open a new pull request? |
Whatever is easy for you, I think its a small issue if you can create a new branch |
Fixes #2856
What changes did you make and why did you make them
for the file:
_data/internal/credits/process.yml
content
field withcontent-type
type
field