Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

edit content field, removed type field from yml credits #3687

Closed

Conversation

luiderek
Copy link
Member

@luiderek luiderek commented Nov 1, 2022

Fixes #2856

What changes did you make and why did you make them

for the file: _data/internal/credits/process.yml

  • replaced the content field with content-type
  • removed the type field

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 1, 2022

Want to review this pull request? Take a look at this documentation for a step by step guide!

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.

git checkout -b luiderek-update-process-yml-2775 gh-pages
git pull https://github.com/luiderek/hfla-website.git update-process-yml-2775

@github-actions github-actions bot added Collaborative Work Dependency An issue is blocking the completion or starting of another issue epic P-Feature: Credit https://www.hackforla.org/credits/ role: front end Tasks for front end developers size: 2pt Can be done in 7-12 hours Complexity: Small Take this type of issues after the successful merge of your second good first issue Status: Updated No blockers and update is ready for review good first issue Good for newcomers role: back end/devOps Tasks for back-end developers size: 0.5pt Can be done in 3 hours or less and removed Collaborative Work Status: Updated No blockers and update is ready for review Dependency An issue is blocking the completion or starting of another issue Complexity: Small Take this type of issues after the successful merge of your second good first issue size: 2pt Can be done in 7-12 hours epic labels Nov 1, 2022
@jyaymie jyaymie self-requested a review November 2, 2022 01:50
@jyaymie
Copy link
Member

jyaymie commented Nov 2, 2022

Review ETA: 11/1/22 7:30pm
Availability: 2 hours

Copy link
Member

@jyaymie jyaymie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fantastic job, @luiderek! You took care of all the action items without making any visible changes to the website. One thing I've been doing when coming up with a branch name is choosing the number of the dependency (in this case, #2856) rather than the issue it's being tracked by (#2775) so it's clear to reviewers that I am only managing the dependency.

@luiderek
Copy link
Member Author

luiderek commented Nov 2, 2022

Yeah, I realized I put in the wrong issue # for my commit / branchname after making the pull request (i had a lot of different tabs open), but wasn't sure if undoing the pull request was the right move in this situation. Just gotta be more careful.

@jyaymie
Copy link
Member

jyaymie commented Nov 2, 2022

Yeah, I realized I put in the wrong issue # for my commit / branchname after making the pull request (i had a lot of different tabs open), but wasn't sure if undoing the pull request was the right move in this situation. Just gotta be more careful.

Gotcha. I would've also committed to this PR and maybe included a small note for my oopsie. I'd be curious to know what the leads would do!

Copy link
Member

@arpitapandya arpitapandya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@luiderek to resolve that, can you check here and see if you can rename it. I see the automation got confused between labels.
I can merge PR, not a big issue but I don't want the number which is irrelevant as it's being tracked and may create other problems.

@luiderek luiderek closed this Nov 2, 2022
@luiderek luiderek deleted the update-process-yml-2775 branch November 2, 2022 04:47
@luiderek
Copy link
Member Author

luiderek commented Nov 2, 2022

Ah, it looks like renaming the branch kills it. Should I restore it or just open a new pull request?

@arpitapandya
Copy link
Member

Ah, it looks like renaming the branch kills it. Should I restore it or just open a new pull request?

Whatever is easy for you, I think its a small issue if you can create a new branch

@luiderek
Copy link
Member Author

luiderek commented Nov 2, 2022

#3689

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers P-Feature: Credit https://www.hackforla.org/credits/ role: back end/devOps Tasks for back-end developers role: front end Tasks for front end developers size: 0.5pt Can be done in 3 hours or less
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Edit content field and remove type field from process.yml credits file
3 participants