Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publish to Guardrails Hub PyPi Action #1126

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

AlejandroEsquivel
Copy link
Contributor

Added re-usable Github action for validators to publish themselves to Guardrails Hub PyPi

@AlejandroEsquivel AlejandroEsquivel marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2024 23:01
@AlejandroEsquivel AlejandroEsquivel marked this pull request as draft October 22, 2024 22:50
@AlejandroEsquivel AlejandroEsquivel marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2024 01:32
@AlejandroEsquivel AlejandroEsquivel requested a review from a team October 24, 2024 05:20
Copy link
Contributor

@JosephCatrambone JosephCatrambone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Haven't pulled and tested. Some ideas for things that could be different but nothing that has to be different. Thank you! Nice work.

Copy link
Contributor

@JosephCatrambone JosephCatrambone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for trying.

Note to future self: the toml lib messes up the writing because (presumably) there is some ambiguity. toml-lang/toml#220

@AlejandroEsquivel AlejandroEsquivel merged commit 200aa9d into main Oct 24, 2024
12 checks passed
@AlejandroEsquivel AlejandroEsquivel deleted the feat/reusable-validator-ci branch October 24, 2024 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants