Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

core: Workaround retry causing memory leak (1.48.x backport) #9415

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2022
Merged

core: Workaround retry causing memory leak (1.48.x backport) #9415

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions core/src/main/java/io/grpc/internal/RetriableStream.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -550,6 +550,10 @@ class SendMessageEntry implements BufferEntry {
@Override
public void runWith(Substream substream) {
substream.stream.writeMessage(method.streamRequest(message));
// TODO(ejona): Workaround Netty memory leak. Message writes always need to be followed by
// flushes (or half close), but retry appears to have a code path that the flushes may
// not happen. The code needs to be fixed and this removed. See #9340.
substream.stream.flush();
}
}

Expand Down
77 changes: 65 additions & 12 deletions core/src/test/java/io/grpc/internal/RetriableStreamTest.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -268,10 +268,14 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
retriableStream.sendMessage("msg3");
retriableStream.request(456);

inOrder.verify(mockStream1, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).request(345);
inOrder.verify(mockStream1, times(2)).flush();
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).request(456);
inOrder.verifyNoMoreInteractions();

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -304,12 +308,19 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
ArgumentCaptor<ClientStreamListener> sublistenerCaptor2 =
ArgumentCaptor.forClass(ClientStreamListener.class);
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).start(sublistenerCaptor2.capture());
inOrder.verify(mockStream2, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).request(345);
inOrder.verify(mockStream2, times(2)).flush();
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).request(456);
inOrder.verify(mockStream2, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).isReady();
inOrder.verifyNoMoreInteractions();

Expand All @@ -319,7 +330,10 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {

// mockStream1 is closed so it is not in the drainedSubstreams
verifyNoMoreInteractions(mockStream1);
inOrder.verify(mockStream2, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround

// retry2
doReturn(mockStream3).when(retriableStreamRecorder).newSubstream(2);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -353,12 +367,19 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
ArgumentCaptor<ClientStreamListener> sublistenerCaptor3 =
ArgumentCaptor.forClass(ClientStreamListener.class);
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).start(sublistenerCaptor3.capture());
inOrder.verify(mockStream3, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).request(345);
inOrder.verify(mockStream3, times(2)).flush();
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).request(456);
inOrder.verify(mockStream3, times(7)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
for (int i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
}
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).isReady();
inOrder.verifyNoMoreInteractions();

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1958,10 +1979,14 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
hedgingStream.sendMessage("msg3");
hedgingStream.request(456);

inOrder.verify(mockStream1, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).request(345);
inOrder.verify(mockStream1, times(2)).flush();
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).request(456);
inOrder.verifyNoMoreInteractions();

Expand All @@ -1984,10 +2009,14 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
ArgumentCaptor<ClientStreamListener> sublistenerCaptor2 =
ArgumentCaptor.forClass(ClientStreamListener.class);
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).start(sublistenerCaptor2.capture());
inOrder.verify(mockStream2, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).request(345);
inOrder.verify(mockStream2, times(2)).flush();
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).request(456);
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).isReady();
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).isReady();
Expand All @@ -1998,9 +2027,13 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
hedgingStream.sendMessage("msg2 after hedge2 starts");

inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verifyNoMoreInteractions();


Expand All @@ -2022,12 +2055,19 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
ArgumentCaptor<ClientStreamListener> sublistenerCaptor3 =
ArgumentCaptor.forClass(ClientStreamListener.class);
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).start(sublistenerCaptor3.capture());
inOrder.verify(mockStream3, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).request(345);
inOrder.verify(mockStream3, times(2)).flush();
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).request(456);
inOrder.verify(mockStream3, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).isReady();
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).isReady();
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).isReady();
Expand All @@ -2036,8 +2076,11 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
// send one more message
hedgingStream.sendMessage("msg1 after hedge3 starts");
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround

// hedge3 receives nonFatalStatus
sublistenerCaptor3.getValue().closed(
Expand All @@ -2047,7 +2090,9 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
// send one more message
hedgingStream.sendMessage("msg1 after hedge3 fails");
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).flush(); // Memory leak workaround

// the hedge mockStream4 starts
fakeClock.forwardTime(HEDGING_DELAY_IN_SECONDS, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
Expand All @@ -2067,12 +2112,19 @@ public Void answer(InvocationOnMock in) {
ArgumentCaptor<ClientStreamListener> sublistenerCaptor4 =
ArgumentCaptor.forClass(ClientStreamListener.class);
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).start(sublistenerCaptor4.capture());
inOrder.verify(mockStream4, times(2)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).request(345);
inOrder.verify(mockStream4, times(2)).flush();
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).request(456);
inOrder.verify(mockStream4, times(4)).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
}
inOrder.verify(mockStream1).isReady();
inOrder.verify(mockStream2).isReady();
inOrder.verify(mockStream4).isReady();
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2190,6 +2242,7 @@ public void hedging_maxAttempts() {

hedgingStream.sendMessage("msg1 after commit");
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).writeMessage(any(InputStream.class));
inOrder.verify(mockStream3).flush(); // Memory leak workaround
inOrder.verifyNoMoreInteractions();

Metadata heders = new Metadata();
Expand Down