Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changed the definition of order in Raviart-Thomas and Nedelec reffes #212

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2020

Conversation

fverdugo
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 17, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #212 into master will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #212      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.07%   89.17%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         141      141              
  Lines        8704     8812     +108     
==========================================
+ Hits         7753     7858     +105     
- Misses        951      954       +3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/ReferenceFEs/RaviartThomasRefFEs.jl 98.49% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/Polynomials/QCurlGradMonomialBases.jl 93.33% <100%> (+8.71%) ⬆️
src/Polynomials/QGradMonomialBases.jl 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/ReferenceFEs/NedelecRefFEs.jl 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/Integration/TensorProductQuadratures.jl 95.34% <0%> (-1.95%) ⬇️
src/Geometry/GenericBoundaryTriangulations.jl 96.38% <0%> (+0.31%) ⬆️
src/Geometry/CartesianGrids.jl 89.41% <0%> (+1.41%) ⬆️
src/Geometry/BoundaryTriangulations.jl 86.11% <0%> (+6.11%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f4deb43...8b6d39e. Read the comment docs.

@fverdugo fverdugo merged commit 4435c9f into master Mar 17, 2020
@fverdugo fverdugo deleted the changing_RT_order_definition branch March 17, 2020 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants