Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schedule ical #140

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 17, 2019
Merged

Schedule ical #140

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 17, 2019

Conversation

bjoernricks
Copy link
Contributor

@bjoernricks bjoernricks commented Jul 16, 2019

Allow to create and modify icalendar based schedules with GMPv8

Checklist:

With GMPv8 we are using icalendar data for schedules.
In GMPv8 the schedule data is based on icalendar.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #140 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #140      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.72%   96.75%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines        3054     3082      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits         2954     2982      +28     
  Misses        100      100
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
gvm/protocols/gmpv8.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 01e4473...c2def1c. Read the comment docs.

@bjoernricks bjoernricks marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2019 14:17
@bjoernricks bjoernricks merged commit f7cf3e1 into greenbone:master Jul 17, 2019
@bjoernricks bjoernricks deleted the schedule-ical branch July 17, 2019 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants