Add rendering for landuse=greenhouse_horticulture

[mfornasa]

Fixes #78

[matthijsmelissen]

See also https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2334

[matthijsmelissen]

This tag gas 18 613 occurrences. As far as I'm concerned, it can be merged.

[matkoniecz]

I strongly dislike the tag itself, I think that such areas should be tagged as landuse=farmland, farmland=greenhouse_horticulture.

But at least such areas should be rendered exactly like farmland - yet another landuse colour is not a good idea.

[dieterdreist]

2014-10-10 17:49 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny [email protected]:

But at least such areas should be rendered exactly like farmland

-1, they are so different that they merit their own rendering style IMHO.
Please have a look:

http://lh4.ggpht.com/-GVwdFatY5W4/UiGe2oPoHZI/AAAAAAAAr60/MBzKZdxoVLE/greenhouses-almeria-3%25255B2%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800
http://lh3.ggpht.com/-ZTtqzs1TqOg/UiGezzFi-2I/AAAAAAAAr6s/8EXbbnX-EaQ/greenhouses-almeria-10%25255B5%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800
http://www.rufepa.com/img/inv_plastico/inv_parral24_z.jpg

visually they are more similar to built-up space than they are to farmland.

In areas with fewer of them they can serve for orientation purposes.

[mfornasa]

I also think that this can be really useful for orientation purposes. Greenhouses are, in fact, buildings, as opposed to farmland, which is usually without buildings.

[matkoniecz]

Greenhouses are, in fact, buildings

Yes, so greenhouses will be tagged and rendered as buildings. Is it reall necessary to make a separate colour for landuse?

[matkoniecz]

@dieterdreist

-1, they are so different that they merit their own rendering style IMHO

I am not convinced. For example patches of small fields, rice terraces, giant corn fields, cauliflower fields, fields of sunflowers, intensively irrigated fields on desert and cotton fields are also really different. Is it a good idea to have a separate rendering for all kinds of farmland?

[dieterdreist]

2014-12-11 17:25 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny [email protected]:

-1, they are so different that they merit their own rendering style IMHO

I am not convinced. For example patches of small fields, rice terraces,
giant corn fields, cauliflower fields, fields of sunflowers, intensively
irrigated fields on desert and cotton fields are also really different. Is
it a good idea to have a separate rendering for all kinds of farmland?

yes, I think it might merit consideration to have different rendering
styles e.g. for fields "under water" and those that are dry. I am not
advocating a completely differentiated farmland map for the main style, but
we are already distinguishing vineyards for instance.

[matkoniecz]

vineyards

also - orchards.

[matthijsmelissen]

Superseded by #1435.