-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 821
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Render leisure=resort #2290
Comments
The wiki article created in 2015 is ok There was no proposal but some discussion in 2013. The nearly empty article tourism=resort should probably point to this tag. |
RU:Tag:leisure=resort provides more information about additional sub classes. We would tag these objects, as they were requested by users (pre Oct 2015) and still functional. The only question is uniform tagging. Most of them have nothing to do with hotels/motels/hostels, in sense you wouldn't visit leisure=resort + resort=kids_camp as adult, unless your children attended there. You wouldn't visit other leisure objects unless your are ill/old/other reason irrelevant to an ordinary/adult tourism and so on. re @pnorman I don't think that mostly outdoor facilities dedicated to children resorts leisure=resort + resort=kids_camp ("детский лагерь") can have global coverage. Not many countries make such distinction, am I wrong? Wikipedia says that they are present at least in some other countries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summer_camp#Around_the_world but are they used? In Canada, summer camps are very popular. About 70% of Canadian camps tend to be affiliated with organizations, while the rest are private. The American Camp Association (ACA) reports that there are about 7,000 overnight camps and about 5,000 day camps in the U.S., for a total of more than 12,000 camps. |
They're present around the world and used, but leisure=resort is mainly used in one area. |
They are concentrated around Europe, but they are also tagged all around the world, so it looks OK for me. I would render them just like other leisure/sport areas. |
I'd see them more tourism-oriented, thus looking towards camp-sites as in the first post might be better than leisure/sport which is more everyday activities. We could also go a step forward and consider all campuses for touristic accommodation, hotel, resort, hostel etc, see #1624 (accommodation). I'd imagine a blue outline (similar to the brown for theme_parks) |
Makes sense for me. |
It looks interesting, it's worth checking. |
For me this is different enough. |
Ok, so should we apply this to all campuses of
|
I think yes in general.
We should check it with zoo, probably this problem is there already. |
I learnt that in the earlier tests, barrier was not really off, since the fence being a closed line, when the object also has an area (landuse?) tag, becomes an area_barrier. Since the outline code uses opacity, we get a few blending effects so that needs to be tested with different landuse backgrounds. |
I'm not sure if we need two lines in the first place. I guess they are good for really big areas, where you want to know what is inside and what is outside (like natural parks), but accommodation areas should be much smaller and light blue (even thinner than currently) could be enough. |
Both are looking very nice for me. Things to check and decide:
|
I think |
Probably I can come back to the outline tests the following weeks. |
I suspect usage would be even higher if it rendered - I'm aware of a few places tagged tourism=resort or tourism=attraction where leisure=resort looks like it might be appropriate. |
If we pick a new color for accommodation icons, we could use a similar
color for the resort outline
…On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 6:49 PM EdLoach ***@***.***> wrote:
I suspect usage would be even higher if it rendered - I'm aware of a few
places tagged tourism=resort or tourism=attraction where leisure=resort
looks like it might be appropriate.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2290 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AoxshP2T5TuT0ECN0hhNid_y_uIwFPM7ks5vDFLFgaJpZM4JnJxQ>
.
|
Yes of course, that's the intention. |
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562255930 invisible in any layer. |
Yes, that's why the ticket is still open. |
I'm wondering if the world's largest resorts show up in OSM... Hmmm, looking at https://www.cntraveler.com/gallery/best-resorts-in-the-world Anyway let's first check if Club Med shows up... |
Yes, in general commenting in opened issues (because issue was not yet fixed) that issue remains unfixed is not useful.
Also, in this particular case it seems to be a mistagged feature anyway.
I am not sire why you thought that this information is useful at all. |
OK I retagged it, based on their Facebook category. Thanks. |
Current taginfo for leisure=resort: Nearly 10K uses. |
I wonder if even the most famous are on the map. Trump has one too in Florida... |
Can anyone suggest a possible workaround until this is implemented? leisure=resort + landuse=recreation_ground ? Anything at all? |
13,7K uses... https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=leisure%3Dresort Maybe it's time to add rendering of leisure=resort to Carto? |
Yes, there are a lot of resorts in the database, but they are not rendered still. |
Let's do it at least in 2022! Before the new summer season came — let's render all resorts… |
This is an open discussion - anyone is welcome to present ideas and arguments. But please understand that the presence of certain ideas in the discussion here (or the lack of critique of them) is not an indication of consensus. A decision will only be made based on a concrete pull request. I have not formed an opinion so far on this - nor do i have a clear understanding of what |
I didn't intend to stop the discussion, but rather to ask id these two points where indeed consensual and see if it was possible to move to other points that where lacking to be able to make a satsifying pull-request |
I think a quick win here (based on my understanding of what I think this at least would get this well-used tag rendered and gives at least some idea of what it is. |
I have added the tag to a building, then moved it to a point on the building. Frustrating, as so often. |
Please don't map for the renderer.
|
I map for the users. |
@BertMule this issue is still open because no one has designed a suitable rendering or submitted a PR (pull request). All work on this map style is done by unpaid volunteers, and anyone is welcome to submit new rendering ideas and requests. See https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md for how to contribute a new PR, if you have the time. |
I have a couple of suggestions for how this could be moved towards an acceptable PR and would appreciate feedback. |
I was just looking at resort areas and found them hard to distinguish without representation. I would love to see borders of resorts, all inclusive clubs, etc. rendered on the map. I see this as a safety and awareness thing as much as a visual appeal. |
Render leisure=resort and label.
Object for example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290825122
I think the color is set like a tourism=camp_site (
@campsite: #def6c0;
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: