WIP: ARM: tegra: Support for Surface RT Type/Touch/Power-Cover; Display fix #45
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
digetx
reviewed
Jul 3, 2021
Comment on lines
+39
to
+40
|
|
||
| nvidia,panel = <&panel>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The root of the problem should be in the bridge node.
@jenneron confirmed on IRC that this change works:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-microsoft-surface-rt.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-microsoft-surface-rt.dts
index f386cae6bc03..1c27d8a43ac9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-microsoft-surface-rt.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-microsoft-surface-rt.dts
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ volume-up {
lvds-encoder {
compatible = "lvds-encoder";
- powerdown-gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(B, 2) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ powerdown-gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(B, 2) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
ports {
#address-cells = <1>;Could you please test it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Works as intended 👍
Didn't knew about the other pullrequest
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll merge this PR, then drop the nvidia,panel and fix the bridge node,
|
Thank you! |
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
to Open-Surface-RT/grate-linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
On x86, prior to ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracecully"), NUMA
nodes could be allocated at three different places.
- numa_register_memblks
- init_cpu_to_node
- init_gi_nodes
All these calls happen at setup_arch, and have the following order:
setup_arch
...
x86_numa_init
numa_init
numa_register_memblks
...
init_cpu_to_node
init_memory_less_node
alloc_node_data
free_area_init_memoryless_node
init_gi_nodes
init_memory_less_node
alloc_node_data
free_area_init_memoryless_node
numa_register_memblks() is only interested in those nodes which have
memory, so it skips over any memoryless node it founds. Later on, when we
have read ACPI's SRAT table, we call init_cpu_to_node() and
init_gi_nodes(), which initialize any memoryless node we might have that
have either CPU or Initiator affinity, meaning we allocate pg_data_t
struct for them and we mark them as ONLINE.
So far so good, but the thing is that after ("mm: handle uninitialized
numa nodes gracefully"), we allocate all possible NUMA nodes in
free_area_init(), meaning we have a picture like the following:
setup_arch
x86_numa_init
numa_init
numa_register_memblks <-- allocate non-memoryless node
x86_init.paging.pagetable_init
...
free_area_init
free_area_init_memoryless <-- allocate memoryless node
init_cpu_to_node
alloc_node_data <-- allocate memoryless node with CPU
free_area_init_memoryless_node
init_gi_nodes
alloc_node_data <-- allocate memoryless node with Initiator
free_area_init_memoryless_node
free_area_init() already allocates all possible NUMA nodes, but
init_cpu_to_node() and init_gi_nodes() are clueless about that, so they go
ahead and allocate a new pg_data_t struct without checking anything,
meaning we end up allocating twice.
It should be mad clear that this only happens in the case where memoryless
NUMA node happens to have a CPU/Initiator affinity.
So get rid of init_memory_less_node() and just set the node online.
Note that setting the node online is needed, otherwise we choke down the
chain when bringup_nonboot_cpus() ends up calling
__try_online_node()->register_one_node()->... and we blow up in
bus_add_device(). As can be seen here:
==========
[ 0.585060] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000060
[ 0.586091] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 0.586831] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 0.586930] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 0.586930] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
[ 0.586930] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc4-1-default+ grate-driver#45
[ 0.586930] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/4
[ 0.586930] RIP: 0010:bus_add_device+0x5a/0x140
[ 0.586930] Code: 8b 74 24 20 48 89 df e8 84 96 ff ff 85 c0 89 c5 75 38 48 8b 53 50 48 85 d2 0f 84 bb 00 004
[ 0.586930] RSP: 0000:ffffc9000022bd10 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 0.586930] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888100987400 RCX: ffff8881003e4e19
[ 0.586930] RDX: ffff8881009a5e00 RSI: ffff888100987400 RDI: ffff888100987400
[ 0.586930] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff8881003e4e18 R09: ffff8881003e4c98
[ 0.586930] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff888100402bc0 R12: ffffffff822ceba0
[ 0.586930] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff888100987400 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 0.586930] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88853fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 0.586930] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 0.586930] CR2: 0000000000000060 CR3: 000000000200a001 CR4: 00000000001706b0
[ 0.586930] Call Trace:
[ 0.586930] <TASK>
[ 0.586930] device_add+0x4c0/0x910
[ 0.586930] __register_one_node+0x97/0x2d0
[ 0.586930] __try_online_node+0x85/0xc0
[ 0.586930] try_online_node+0x25/0x40
[ 0.586930] cpu_up+0x4f/0x100
[ 0.586930] bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60
[ 0.586930] smp_init+0x26/0x79
[ 0.586930] kernel_init_freeable+0x130/0x2f1
[ 0.586930] ? rest_init+0x100/0x100
[ 0.586930] kernel_init+0x17/0x150
[ 0.586930] ? rest_init+0x100/0x100
[ 0.586930] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 0.586930] </TASK>
[ 0.586930] Modules linked in:
[ 0.586930] CR2: 0000000000000060
[ 0.586930] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
==========
The reason is simple, by the time bringup_nonboot_cpus() gets called, we
did not register the node_subsys bus yet, so we crash when
bus_add_device() tries to dereference bus()->p.
The following shows the order of the calls:
kernel_init_freeable
smp_init
bringup_nonboot_cpus
...
bus_add_device() <- we did not register node_subsys yet
do_basic_setup
do_initcalls
postcore_initcall(register_node_type);
register_node_type
subsys_system_register
subsys_register
bus_register <- register node_subsys bus
Why setting the node online saves us then? Well, simply because
__try_online_node() backs off when the node is online, meaning we do not
end up calling register_one_node() in the first place.
This is subtle, broken and deserves a deep analysis and thought about how
to put this into shape, but for now let us have this easy fix for the
leaking memory issue.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: da4490c ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracefully")
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Wei Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Makhalov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
okias
pushed a commit
to okias/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2024
commit 9fce92f upstream. After the blamed commit below, the TCP sockets (and the MPTCP subflows) can build egress packets larger than 64K. That exceeds the maximum DSS data size, the length being misrepresent on the wire and the stream being corrupted, as later observed on the receiver: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9696 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:705 __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow+0x2604/0x26e0 CPU: 0 PID: 9696 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc5-gcd8bdf563d46 grate-driver#45 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 netlink: 8 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.4'. RIP: 0010:__mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow+0x2604/0x26e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:705 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006e80 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffffffff83e9f674 RBX: ffff88802f45d870 RCX: ffff888102ad0000 netlink: 8 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.4'. RDX: 0000000080000303 RSI: 0000000000013908 RDI: 0000000000003908 RBP: ffffc90000007110 R08: ffffffff83e9e078 R09: 1ffff1100e548c8a R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100e548c8b R12: 0000000000013908 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000003908 R15: 000000000031cf29 FS: 00007f239c47e700(0000) GS:ffff88811b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f239c45cd78 CR3: 000000006a66c006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> mptcp_data_ready+0x263/0xac0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:819 subflow_data_ready+0x268/0x6d0 net/mptcp/subflow.c:1409 tcp_data_queue+0x21a1/0x7a60 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5151 tcp_rcv_established+0x950/0x1d90 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6098 tcp_v6_do_rcv+0x554/0x12f0 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1483 tcp_v6_rcv+0x2e26/0x3810 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1749 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xd6b/0x1ae0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:438 ip6_input+0x1c5/0x470 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:483 ipv6_rcv+0xef/0x2c0 include/linux/netfilter.h:304 __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x6a0 net/core/dev.c:5532 process_backlog+0x353/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5974 __napi_poll+0xc6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:6536 net_rx_action+0x6a0/0xfd0 net/core/dev.c:6603 __do_softirq+0x184/0x524 kernel/softirq.c:553 do_softirq+0xdd/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:454 Address the issue explicitly bounding the maximum GSO size to what MPTCP actually allows. Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]> Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#450 Fixes: 7c4e983 ("net: allow gso_max_size to exceed 65536") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114-upstream-net-20231113-mptcp-misc-fixes-6-7-rc2-v1-1-7b9cd6a7b7f4@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type/Touch/Power-Cover Support for Surface RT:
tCover is connected via HID over I2C.
Sadly the slave address is 0x00 which is reserved as general call address.
The patch allows the I2C driver only to accept 0x00 as valid address if the device is a Surface RT.
i2c-hotplug-gpioallows to hotplug the tCovers.Tests
Tested on Surface RT with latest grate-linux kernel.
Plugged in the first cover after boot and changed the covers randomly.
Tested with following covers:
VendorID and ProductID were read correctly and every cover worked after hotplug.
Display fix:
Added the property:
nvidia,panel