docs: Reorganize examples folder to match docs structure #3026
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rperry2174
changed the title
knylander-grafana
added
the
type/docs
|
I searched the docs for links to the file locations changed in this PR. Here is the doc PR with those updated links: #3027 |
|
@Rperry2174 thanks for pinging me – I've pushed changed straight to the branch |
simonswine
added a commit
to simonswine/pyroscope
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
This was broken by grafana#3026
simonswine
added a commit
to simonswine/pyroscope
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
This was broken by grafana#3026
This was referenced Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reorganizes our examples to match the "configure the client" part of our docs. I'm not sure if this will break things in places where we use these examples.
i.e.
/tracing/tempofolder we use relative references and this might mess that up cc @kolesnikovaeWe will also probably need to go through docs and make sure that we didn't break any links there where we link to the examples. cc @knylander-grafana :
