-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
promtail: Fix issue with dropping logs when a file based SD target's labels are updated #7016
Conversation
./tools/diff_coverage.sh ../loki-main/test_results.txt test_results.txt ingester,distributor,querier,querier/queryrange,iter,storage,chunkenc,logql,loki Change in test coverage per package. Green indicates 0 or positive change, red indicates that test coverage for a package fell. + ingester 0%
+ distributor 0%
+ querier 0%
+ querier/queryrange 0%
+ iter 0%
+ storage 0%
+ chunkenc 0%
+ logql 0%
+ loki 0% |
./tools/diff_coverage.sh ../loki-main/test_results.txt test_results.txt ingester,distributor,querier,querier/queryrange,iter,storage,chunkenc,logql,loki Change in test coverage per package. Green indicates 0 or positive change, red indicates that test coverage for a package fell. + ingester 0%
+ distributor 0%
+ querier 0%
+ querier/queryrange 0%
+ iter 0%
+ storage 0%
+ chunkenc 0%
+ logql 0%
+ loki 0% |
this is ready for review now |
./tools/diff_coverage.sh ../loki-main/test_results.txt test_results.txt ingester,distributor,querier,querier/queryrange,iter,storage,chunkenc,logql,loki Change in test coverage per package. Green indicates 0 or positive change, red indicates that test coverage for a package fell. + ingester 0%
+ distributor 0%
+ querier 0%
+ querier/queryrange 0%
+ iter 0%
+ storage 0%
+ chunkenc 0%
+ logql 0%
+ loki 0% |
./tools/diff_coverage.sh ../loki-main/test_results.txt test_results.txt ingester,distributor,querier,querier/queryrange,iter,storage,chunkenc,logql,loki Change in test coverage per package. Green indicates 0 or positive change, red indicates that test coverage for a package fell. + ingester 0%
+ distributor 0%
+ querier 0%
+ querier/queryrange 0%
+ iter 0%
+ storage 0%
+ chunkenc 0%
+ logql 0%
+ loki 0% |
Thanks for submitting a PR! I've made some suggestions but this looks reasonable.
|
Hi @MasslessParticle I don't see the suggestions you mentioned above. Is there something I need to do to see them? |
// keep track of how many targets are using a fileEventWatcher | ||
watcherUseCount := make(map[string]int, len(s.fileEventWatchers)) | ||
for _, target := range s.targets { | ||
if _, ok := watcherUseCount[target.path]; !ok { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can always say watcherUserCount[target.path]++
here because 0 is the default value: https://go.dev/play/p/qotVnYhrlKK
k := target.path | ||
_, ok := watcherUseCount[k] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can be written as
if _, ok := watcherUseCount[k]; !ok {
level.Warn(s.log).Log("msg", "failed to find file event watcher", "path", k)
continue
}
to avoid the following else clause
Sorry about that, @afayngelerindbx! I didn't click the |
No worries. Happens to me all the time |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comments; along with Travis' comments there's another opportunity to simplify things.
Reviewing this PR also makes me think it would be worth it to break the logic within sync
into multiple functions.
@@ -373,7 +395,6 @@ func (s *targetSyncer) sync(groups []*targetgroup.Group, targetEventHandler chan | |||
} | |||
} | |||
} | |||
s.droppedTargets = dropped |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
moving this line doesn't seem necessary to change the behaviour of keeping or removing a file watcher, so lets not move it in this PR
watcherUseCount := make(map[string]int, len(s.fileEventWatchers)) | ||
for _, target := range s.targets { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we could simplify/remove the need for this extra loop on every sync
call by storing the watcherUseCount
as a field in the targetSyncer
struct
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm going to approve this. There's some feedback around style/code construction, but the idea LGTM. Feel free to address those, but I'd like to merge this soon.
Thanks and sorry for the late review.
…labels are updated (grafana#7016) <!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Before submitting: 1. Read our CONTRIBUTING.md guide 2. Name your PR as `<Feature Area>: Describe your change`. a. Do not end the title with punctuation. It will be added in the changelog. b. Start with an imperative verb. Example: Fix the latency between System A and System B. c. Use sentence case, not title case. d. Use a complete phrase or sentence. The PR title will appear in a changelog, so help other people understand what your change will be. 3. Rebase your PR if it gets out of sync with main --> **What this PR does / why we need it**: Allows for modifying labels for a target and continuing to scrape logs afterwards. **Which issue(s) this PR fixes**: Fixes grafana#7001 **Special notes for your reviewer**: <!-- Note about CHANGELOG entries, if a change adds: * an important feature * fixes an issue present in a previous release, * causes a change in operation that would be useful for an operator of Loki to know then please add a CHANGELOG entry. For documentation changes, build changes, simple fixes etc please skip this step. We are attempting to curate a changelog of the most relevant and important changes to be easier to ingest by end users of Loki. Note about the upgrade guide, if this changes: * default configuration values * metric names or label names * changes existing log lines such as the metrics.go query output line * configuration parameters * anything to do with any API * any other change that would require special attention or extra steps to upgrade Please document clearly what changed AND what needs to be done in the upgrade guide. --> **Checklist** - [ ] Documentation added - [x] Tests updated - [x] Is this an important fix or new feature? Add an entry in the `CHANGELOG.md`. - [ ] Changes that require user attention or interaction to upgrade are documented in `docs/sources/upgrading/_index.md`
What this PR does / why we need it:
Allows for modifying labels for a target and continuing to scrape logs afterwards.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #7001
Special notes for your reviewer:
Checklist
CHANGELOG.md
.docs/sources/upgrading/_index.md