Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix!: make cluster_band optional, undefined if no cluster is found #105

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2024

Conversation

sd2k
Copy link
Collaborator

@sd2k sd2k commented Aug 2, 2024

Closes #104.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced handling of clustering outputs by allowing the cluster_band field to be optional, improving robustness in scenarios with insufficient input data.
    • Introduced lazy initialization for normal_band, optimizing memory usage.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated logic to ensure the correct behavior of the cluster_band across various input conditions.
  • Tests

    • Expanded test cases to validate the presence and absence of cluster_band under different scenarios, ensuring comprehensive coverage.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce optionality to the cluster_band field in the OutlierOutput struct across the augurs-js and augurs-outlier crates. This allows the representation of cases where no cluster is found, enhancing the robustness of the code. Additionally, modifications in the DBSCANDetector and MADDetector improve memory management through lazy initialization of the normal_band, ensuring better handling of varying scenarios in clustering algorithms.

Changes

Files Change Summary
crates/augurs-js/src/outlier.rs, cluster_band changed to Option<ClusterBand> in OutlierOutput; conversion logic updated.
crates/augurs-outlier/src/lib.rs cluster_band changed to Option<Band>; constructor updated to accept Option<Band>.
crates/augurs-outlier/src/dbscan.rs, normal_band changed to Option<Band>, initialized to None; lazy initialization introduced.
crates/augurs-outlier/src/mad.rs normal_band now wraps Band in Option, allowing for absence representation.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant DBSCANDetector
    participant MADDetector
    participant OutlierOutput

    User->>DBSCANDetector: Request clustering
    DBSCANDetector->>OutlierOutput: Generate OutlierOutput
    OutlierOutput->>User: Return results with cluster_band (optional)

    User->>MADDetector: Request MAD analysis
    MADDetector->>OutlierOutput: Generate OutlierOutput
    OutlierOutput->>User: Return results with cluster_band (optional)
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
cluster_band should be optional, in case no cluster is found (#104)

🐰 "In fields so bright, with bands to see,
Where clusters hide, or maybe flee.
An option now, for all to find,
A dance of data, sweetly aligned.
With joy we hop, our code refined!" 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sd2k
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sd2k commented Aug 2, 2024

fyi @matyax 🙂

@sd2k sd2k changed the title fix!: make cluster_band optional, undefined if no cluster is found fix!: make cluster_band optional, undefined if no cluster is found Aug 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f16f9a4 and 9e536e6.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • crates/augurs-js/src/outlier.rs (1 hunks)
  • crates/augurs-outlier/src/dbscan.rs (5 hunks)
  • crates/augurs-outlier/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
  • crates/augurs-outlier/src/mad.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
crates/augurs-outlier/src/lib.rs (2)

50-54: LGTM!

The change to make cluster_band an Option<Band> is appropriate and well-documented.


Line range hint 59-67:
LGTM!

The constructor update to accept an Option<Band> for the cluster_band parameter is consistent with the struct definition changes.

crates/augurs-js/src/outlier.rs (2)

315-319: LGTM!

The change to make cluster_band an Option<ClusterBand> is appropriate and well-documented.


327-327: LGTM!

The update to the From implementation to map cluster_band using map(Into::into) is consistent with the struct definition changes and handles the optional value correctly.

crates/augurs-outlier/src/mad.rs (1)

217-220: LGTM!

The change to wrap normal_band in an Option is appropriate and enhances the flexibility of the MADDetector implementation.

crates/augurs-outlier/src/dbscan.rs (6)

94-94: Good use of lazy initialization for normal_band.

Initializing normal_band as None and using lazy initialization optimizes memory usage by deferring the creation of the Band until it is actually needed.


128-130: Efficient creation of Band using get_or_insert_with.

Using get_or_insert_with ensures that the Band is only created when a cluster is found, which aligns with the lazy initialization approach and optimizes resource usage.


564-564: Important validation for cluster_band in test test_tiny.

Including an assertion to check if cluster_band is Some ensures that the presence of cluster_band is validated, which is important for verifying the new behavior.


613-613: Important validation for cluster_band in test test_realistic.

Including an assertion to check if cluster_band is Some ensures that the presence of cluster_band is validated, which is important for verifying the new behavior.


635-636: Important validation for cluster_band in test test_missing_data_at_start.

Including an assertion to check if cluster_band is Some ensures that the presence of cluster_band is validated, which is important for verifying the new behavior.


638-657: Crucial test cases for validating cluster_band behavior.

The new test cases test_no_cluster_band_small_eps and test_no_cluster_band_two_series are crucial for ensuring that the cluster_band field is correctly handled when no clusters are found, aligning with the PR objectives.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

🐰Bencher

ReportFri, August 2, 2024 at 17:39:15 UTC
Projectaugurs
Branch105/merge
Testbedubuntu-latest
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyLatency Results
nanoseconds (ns) | (Δ%)
Latency Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns) | (%)
auto_fit/air_passengers✅ (view plot)1,895,800.00 (-0.40%)1,916,823.28 (98.90%)
fit/air_passengers✅ (view plot)434,880.00 (+0.11%)442,143.45 (98.36%)
forecast/air_passengers✅ (view plot)1,399.60 (+0.74%)1,410.90 (99.20%)
season_eight✅ (view plot)20,755.00 (-0.50%)21,110.80 (98.31%)
vic_elec✅ (view plot)37,724,000.00 (+0.31%)37,874,871.57 (99.60%)

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

@sd2k sd2k merged commit edf6606 into main Aug 3, 2024
23 checks passed
@sd2k sd2k deleted the cluster-band-optional branch August 3, 2024 01:05
@sd2k sd2k mentioned this pull request Aug 3, 2024
@sd2k sd2k mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2024
@sd2k sd2k mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

augurs-outlier: cluster_band should be optional, in case no cluster is found
1 participant