Skip to content

Repository containing all the codes and computation of g-values to compare with EPR experiments.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

graeter-group/g-tensors-PPEpaper

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

52 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

To check how these values were computed, just check the instructions in this repository.

Distances(Ă…)

Image 1

BDEs

The system considered here are:

  • left: with Phenyl group.
  • right: without Phenyl group.
  • red: tripple bond
  • blue: single bond.
Image 1 Image 2

Orca

  • With Phenyl group:

BDE triple bond: 0.28992840000000797 Ha / 753.8138400000207 kJ/mol

BDE single bond: 0.19708169999989877 Ha / 512.4124199997368 kJ/mol

  • Without Phenyl group

BDE triple bond: 0.15881231000003027 Ha / 412.9120060000787 kJ/mol

BDE single bond: 0.07075292000013178 Ha / 183.95759200034263 kJ/mol

g09

  • With Phenyl group:

BDE triple bond: 0.3037380000000667 Ha / 789.7188000001734 kJ/mol

BDE single bond: 0.2125549999998384 Ha / 552.6429999995798 kJ/mol

  • Without Phenyl group

BDE triple bond: 0.30262000000016087 Ha / 786.8120000004183 kJ/mol

BDE single bond: 0.21594000000027336 Ha / 561.4440000007107 kJ/mol

G-values

Summary table

$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & g-x & g-y & g-z & \text{max abs error} & \text{avrg error} \\ \hline \text{A) AlkylShift} & 2.0027921 & 2.0027617 & 2.002214 & 0.0004479 & 0.0000941 \\ \hline \text{B) Hshift} & 2.0028401 & 2.0027267 & 2.0021777 & 0.0003999 & 0.0001018 \\ \hline \text{C) Rhop} & 2.0028697 & 2.0026887 & 2.0021882 & 0.0003703 & 0.0001011 \\ \hline \text{D) Rhop-LeftPhenyl} & 2.0028722 & 2.0026881 & 2.0021858 & 0.0003678 & 0.0001013 \\ \hline \text{E) Rhop-RightPhenyl} & 2.0028699 & 2.0027005 & 2.0021878 & 0.0003701 & 0.0000973 \\ \hline \text{F) inchain} & 2.0028729 & 2.0026999 & 2.0021857 & 0.0003671 & 0.0000972 \\ \hline \text{G) inchainLarger} & 2.0028614 & 2.0026918 & 2.0021557 & 0.0003786 & 0.0001137 \\ \hline \text{H) primary-in-ring} & 2.0029464 & 2.0021418 & 2.001633 & 0.0005470 & 0.0004429 \\ \hline \text{I) primary-in-triple} & 2.0069655 & 2.0034297 & 2.0022073 & -0.0000273 & -0.0015175 \\ \hline \text{J) triple-broken} & 2.0269326 & 2.0031967 & 2.0020897 & 0.0000903 & -0.0080563 \\ \hline \text{K) Hshift-FarRad1} & 2.0028127 & 2.0027716 & 2.0021815 & 0.0004273 & 0.0000947 \\ \hline \text{L) Hshift-FarRad2} & 2.0027441 & 2.0027325 & 2.0021738 & 0.0004959 & 0.0001332 \\ \hline \text{M) Rhop-FarRad1} & 2.0028156 & 2.0027666 & 2.0021818 & 0.0004244 & 0.0000953 \\ \hline \text{N) Rhop-FarRad2} & 2.002743 & 2.0027282 & 2.002174 & 0.0004970 & 0.0001349 \\ \hline \text{Experiment} & 2.00324 & 2.00263 & 2.00218 & & \\ \hline \end{array}$$
Image 1

Note: the names on the next tables means

  • cc-pVDZ: cc-pVDZ basis set, g-values with the origin in the center of the electronic distribution.
  • cc-pVDZ i: cc-pVDZ basis set, g-values computed with invariant method.
  • cc-pVDZ: EPR_II basis set (created to this aim), g-values with the origin in the center of the electronic distribution.
  • cc-pVDZ i: EPR_II basis set (created to this aim), g-values computed with invariant method. This is suppossed to give the most precise outcomes.

AlkylShift

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.002902 & 2.0027826 & 2.0029046 & 2.0027921 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.002772 & 2.0027585 & 2.0027801 & 2.0027617 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0023613 & 2.0022185 & 2.0023653 & 2.002214 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0003380 & 0.0004574 & 0.0003354 & 0.0004479 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & 0.0000049 & 0.0000968 & 0.0000000 & 0.0000941 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Hshift

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0028359 & 2.0028217 & 2.0028587 & 2.0028401 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0027302 & 2.0027232 & 2.0026851 & 2.0027267 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0022594 & 2.0021786 & 2.0022577 & 2.0021777 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0004041 & 0.0004183 & 0.0003813 & 0.0003999 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & 0.0000748 & 0.0001088 & 0.0000828 & 0.0001018 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Rhop

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0028608 & 2.0028423 & 2.0028944 & 2.0028697 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0027038 & 2.002698 & 2.0026433 & 2.0026887 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0022715 & 2.0021861 & 2.0022684 & 2.0021882 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0003792 & 0.0003977 & 0.0003456 & 0.0003703 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & 0.0000713 & 0.0001079 & 0.0000813 & 0.0001011 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Rhop-LeftPhenyl

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0028855 & 2.0028413 & 2.0028726 & 2.0028722 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0027167 & 2.0026956 & 2.0026196 & 2.0026881 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.002321 & 2.0021841 & 2.0023143 & 2.0021858 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0003545 & 0.0003987 & 0.0003674 & 0.0003678 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & 0.0000423 & 0.0001097 & 0.0000812 & 0.0001013 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Rhop-RightPhenyl

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0028408 & 2.0028327 & 2.0029394 & 2.0028699 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0027108 & 2.0027108 & 2.0026909 & 2.0027005 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0022471 & 2.0021856 & 2.0022474 & 2.0021878 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0003992 & 0.0004073 & 0.0003006 & 0.0003701 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & 0.0000838 & 0.0001070 & 0.0000574 & 0.0000973 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

inchain

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0028335 & 2.0028328 & 2.0028977 & 2.0028729 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.002724 & 2.0027088 & 2.0026735 & 2.0026999 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0022731 & 2.0021842 & 2.0022707 & 2.0021857 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0004065 & 0.0004072 & 0.0003423 & 0.0003671 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & 0.0000731 & 0.0001081 & 0.0000694 & 0.0000972 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

inchainLarger

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0028397 & 2.002821 & 2.0028996 & 2.0028614 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0027243 & 2.0026962 & 2.0026731 & 2.0026918 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0022746 & 2.0021626 & 2.0022718 & 2.0021557 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0004003 & 0.0004190 & 0.0003404 & 0.0003786 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & 0.0000705 & 0.0001234 & 0.0000685 & 0.0001137 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

primary_in_ring

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0031548 & 2.0029421 & 2.0031225 & 2.0029464 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0021617 & 2.0021429 & 2.0021539 & 2.0021418 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.001818 & 2.0016573 & 2.0017157 & 2.001633 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0004683 & 0.0005227 & 0.0004761 & 0.0005470 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & 0.0003052 & 0.0004359 & 0.0003526 & 0.0004429 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

primary_in_triple

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0069623 & 2.006973 & 2.0069426 & 2.0069655 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0038729 & 2.003522 & 2.0037258 & 2.0034297 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0023758 & 2.0022109 & 2.002365 & 2.0022073 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & -0.0001958 & -0.0000309 & -0.0001850 & -0.0000273 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & -0.0017203 & -0.0015520 & -0.0016611 & -0.0015175 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

triple_broken

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0126297 & 2.012587 & 2.0270687 & 2.0269326 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0037159 & 2.0031968 & 2.0036261 & 2.0031967 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0023688 & 2.0020968 & 2.0023129 & 2.0020897 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & -0.0001888 & 0.0000832 & -0.0001329 & 0.0000903 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & -0.0035548 & -0.0032769 & -0.0083192 & -0.0080563 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Hshift_FarRad1

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0028834 & 2.0028003 & 2.0029103 & 2.0028127 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0027474 & 2.0027434 & 2.0028148 & 2.0027716 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0022701 & 2.0021818 & 2.0022681 & 2.0021815 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0003566 & 0.0004397 & 0.0003297 & 0.0004273 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & 0.0000497 & 0.0001082 & 0.0000189 & 0.0000947 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Hshift_FarRad2

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0030016 & 2.00272 & 2.0030251 & 2.0027441 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0028498 & 2.0027097 & 2.0028914 & 2.0027325 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0024106 & 2.0021851 & 2.0024004 & 2.0021738 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0002384 & 0.0005200 & 0.0002149 & 0.0004959 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & -0.0000707 & 0.0001451 & -0.0000890 & 0.0001332 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Rhop_FarRad1

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline \end{array}$$

Rhop_FarRad2

The Carbon with larger radius is the one "with the radical"

Image 1 Image 2
$$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{experiments} & \text{cc-pVDZ} & \text{cc-pVDZ i} & \text{EPR II} & \text{EPR II i} \\ \hline g_x & 2.00324 & 2.0030102 & 2.0027176 & 2.0030353 & 2.002743 \\ \hline g_y & 2.00263 & 2.0028492 & 2.0027082 & 2.0028891 & 2.0027282 \\ \hline g_z & 2.00218 & 2.0024236 & 2.0021849 & 2.0024135 & 2.002174 \\ \hline \text{max absolute error} & & 0.0002298 & 0.0005224 & 0.0002047 & 0.0004970 \\ \hline \text{average error} & & -0.0000777 & 0.0001464 & -0.0000960 & 0.0001349 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Plot of g-values.

Image 1

About

Repository containing all the codes and computation of g-values to compare with EPR experiments.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published