Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cl: types record check selection/index expr is addressable #1785

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

visualfc
Copy link
Member

@visualfc visualfc commented Mar 4, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.77419% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.25%. Comparing base (ffe6653) to head (288c9cb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
cl/recorder.go 96.77% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1785      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.22%   92.25%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines       11021    11047      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits        10164    10191      +27     
  Misses        694      694              
+ Partials      163      162       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@visualfc visualfc force-pushed the types_address branch 2 times, most recently from 518107d to ae04571 Compare March 4, 2024 04:03
@visualfc visualfc changed the title cl: types record check selection filed is address cl: types record check selection/index expr is address Mar 4, 2024
@xushiwei xushiwei merged commit 4332c97 into goplus:main Mar 5, 2024
14 checks passed
@xushiwei xushiwei changed the title cl: types record check selection/index expr is address cl: types record check selection/index expr is addressable Mar 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants