Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lock protoc-gen-go to 1.0 release #241

Merged

Conversation

markmandel
Copy link
Member

Noticed that this library wasn't locked to a version, so when I attempt to regen the code, I got some incompatible code.

This fixes things.

Noticed that this library wasn't locked to a version,
so when I attempt to regen the code, I got some incompatible
code.

This fixes things.
@markmandel markmandel added area/build-tools Development tooling. I.e. pretty much everything in the `build` directory. feature-freeze-do-not-merge Only eligible to be merged once we are out of feature freeze (next full release) labels Jun 4, 2018
@agones-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Build Succeeded 👏

Build Id: 60457f73-41ef-494e-99c0-7c36e9bc5c83

The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:

@markmandel markmandel removed the feature-freeze-do-not-merge Only eligible to be merged once we are out of feature freeze (next full release) label Jun 6, 2018
@agones-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Build Succeeded 👏

Build Id: f83f2343-f2fe-4c0b-9df4-de5e615a5606

The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:

@markmandel markmandel merged commit bafd642 into googleforgames:master Jun 6, 2018
@markmandel markmandel deleted the feature/lock-protoc-gen-go branch June 6, 2018 19:33
@markmandel markmandel added this to the 0.3.0 milestone Jun 15, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/build-tools Development tooling. I.e. pretty much everything in the `build` directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants