-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: option to use bq connection without check #460
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bb77dd6
feat: option to use bq connection without check
shobsi 8544bd1
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/github/main' into shobs-rf…
shobsi f066f5f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/github/main' into shobs-rf…
shobsi de5e6fa
revert breaking signature change, centralize connection manager skipping
shobsi 8ea4190
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/github/main' into shobs-rf…
shobsi 3da2f6b
fix bad referencing
shobsi e0c090c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/github/main' into shobs-rf…
shobsi 84037d5
use public property from session
shobsi 6fcb6b7
revert unintended test_iam_permissions change
shobsi 467eb03
fix couple of more unwanted changes
shobsi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would think of creating a dummy ConnectionManager class, and when skip_bq_connection_check is True, use the dummy implementation instead of a real one. Then the same logic can apply to all the places, and the user (of the connection_manager) doesn't need to think about the implementations.
Well just a suggestion, up to you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Um, gave it a thought, feels weird to implement a class with a method create_bq_connection which doesn't create anything. I'd prefer to not do that. Let me know if you have strong opinion about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case we'd rename the create_bq_connection to sth like prepare_bq_connection.
No need to put too much thoughts on it. Just a suggestion.