Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 5, 2019. It is now read-only.

Moving locking logic into storage base class. #379

Conversation

theacodes
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@theacodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Coverage decreased (-0.0009%) to 94.45%

ಠ_ಠ

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Jan 6, 2016

This LGTM. Coverage drop doesn't seem to be an issue looking at the coveralls report.

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Jan 6, 2016

FWIW, comparing (a + line_change) / (b + line_change) to a / b will no longer be an issue once a = b (i.e. 100% coverage, go #212!)

@theacodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cool. @nathanielmanistaatgoogle care to take a look?

nathanielmanistaatgoogle added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2016
Moved locking logic into storage base class.
@nathanielmanistaatgoogle nathanielmanistaatgoogle merged commit 6531263 into googleapis:master Jan 6, 2016
@theacodes theacodes deleted the locking-to-base-storage branch January 6, 2016 18:53
@dhermes dhermes mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants