-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: upgrade shared config to 1.5.3, exclude google-http-client and google-http-client-gson from gax in google-cloud-bigtable-stats #1336
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
34c318c
deps: upgrade shared config to 1.5.3, remove google-http-client and g…
blakeli0 a68d5e9
exclude google-http-client and google-http-client-gson from google-cl…
blakeli0 1cbfa75
exclude google-http-client and google-http-client-gson from google-cl…
blakeli0 014bf39
🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor
gcf-owl-bot[bot] 2703c0d
Add comments to explain excluded dependencies.
blakeli0 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you sure that GAX can work without google-http-client, in library users' environment?
If yes, can you add source-code comment explains why this exclusion does not give any harm to library users' environment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is only excluding
google-http-client
fromgoogle-cloud-bigtable-stats
, not fromgoogle-cloud-bigtable
. I checked the usage of gax ingoogle-cloud-bigtable-stats
, which appears to be only referencing a few annotations, plus the integration tests should catch it if they are required.We can make all checks pass by either excluding these here or add them to the exclude list in the dependency list check here.
Is there any best practices that prefer not to exclude dependencies? If not, I feel this solution is better since we don't need them, so instead of exclude them in the check, I'd rather exclude them in the pom directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you. Excluding the unnecessary dependency is better in that has difference in users class path. It's good that these dependencies are not used.