Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: in StreamWriterV2, supports new append, which takes rows and offset #894

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 1, 2021

Conversation

yayi-google
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> ☕️

@yayi-google yayi-google requested review from a team and steffnay February 26, 2021 00:52
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. label Feb 26, 2021
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Feb 26, 2021
@yayi-google yayi-google requested review from bigang-li and yirutang and removed request for steffnay February 26, 2021 00:53
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #894 (dd8f406) into master (438f1c3) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 93.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #894      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     80.91%   80.95%   +0.03%     
- Complexity     1017     1020       +3     
============================================
  Files            76       76              
  Lines          5518     5533      +15     
  Branches        425      427       +2     
============================================
+ Hits           4465     4479      +14     
  Misses          880      880              
- Partials        173      174       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...cloud/bigquery/storage/v1beta2/StreamWriterV2.java 95.94% <93.33%> (-0.19%) 38.00 <2.00> (+3.00) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 438f1c3...e8a3c63. Read the comment docs.

public ApiFuture<AppendRowsResponse> append(ProtoRows rows, long offset) {
// TODO: Move this check to builder after the other append is removed.
if (this.writerSchema == null) {
throw new StatusRuntimeException(

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this needs to be in at the writer builder for sure, here is not a proper place to validate this.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. That's why I have a TODO here.

I need to put it here instead for backward compatibility reason. Otherwise, it would break existing customers. For example, the sample will stop working because the version is bumped up automatically.

I just need to do it in two phases.

if (this.writerSchema == null) {
throw new StatusRuntimeException(
Status.fromCode(Code.INVALID_ARGUMENT)
.withDescription("Writer schema must be provided when building this writer."));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this needs to be moved then no worries but otherwise, maybe we need to add a test for this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

* @param offset the offset of the first row.
* @return the append response wrapped in a future.
*/
public ApiFuture<AppendRowsResponse> append(ProtoRows rows, long offset) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we simply accept byte strings?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as above.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think byte string is cleaner in this case. But since this builds with API anyway, I am fine with ProtoRows.

public ApiFuture<AppendRowsResponse> append(ProtoRows rows, long offset) {
// TODO: Move this check to builder after the other append is removed.
if (this.writerSchema == null) {
throw new StatusRuntimeException(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@stephaniewang526 stephaniewang526 merged commit f3865b0 into master Mar 1, 2021
@stephaniewang526 stephaniewang526 deleted the new-append branch March 1, 2021 18:23
gcf-merge-on-green bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2021
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\* 
---
## [1.13.0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/compare/v1.12.0...v1.13.0) (2021-03-01)


### Features

* **generator:** update protoc to v3.15.3 ([#898](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/issues/898)) ([2f277d6](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/commit/2f277d650e8f617c6253843baf73d5d220713a61))
* in StreamWriterV2, supports new append, which takes rows and offset ([#894](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/issues/894)) ([f3865b0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/commit/f3865b06ea7c61e95d3ee9bc7b46857d9d3080cc))
* StreamWriterV2 will handle schema/streamName attachment ([#877](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/issues/877)) ([c54bcfe](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/commit/c54bcfec1706eef58eaf9dad8b49dc79fc8da133))


### Dependencies

* update dependency com.google.cloud:google-cloud-bigquery to v1.127.5 ([#896](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/issues/896)) ([d211c76](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/commit/d211c76dff747121d4560b55818c10bf595ef1c3))
* update dependency com.google.cloud:google-cloud-shared-dependencies to v0.20.0 ([#892](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/issues/892)) ([438f1c3](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/commit/438f1c3b551e6b97a3241c69f2006a5a6be78c4f))
---


This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
shubhwip pushed a commit to shubhwip/java-bigquerystorage that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants