We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently it's a bit cumbersome to define derivative types closely related to another a given struct parametrics.
One need to derive type from parametrics on every use thru local type =.
type =
Similar to const support within impl, it should be nice to be able define struct-level type aliases that are in scope within impl methods.
const
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Even better if those would also be visible in struct definition so that you can use alias to type members related to struct parametrics.
struct
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
What's hard to do? (limit 100 words)
Currently it's a bit cumbersome to define derivative types closely related to another a given struct parametrics.
Current best alternative workaround (limit 100 words)
One need to derive type from parametrics on every use thru local
type =
.Your view of the "best case XLS enhancement" (limit 100 words)
Similar to
const
support within impl, it should be nice to be able define struct-level type aliases that are in scope within impl methods.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: