Add Content.functionResponses utility #159
Merged
+37
−27
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The alternative when replying to multiple functions in parallel is to use the `Content` constructor and pass the string `'function'` to the `role` parameter. Use a static method to obscure the role string for consistency with the others. Update sample with a demonstration of replying to all function calls.
cynthiajoan
approved these changes
May 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The alternative when replying to multiple functions in parallel is to
use the
Contentconstructor and pass the string'function'to theroleparameter. Use a static method to obscure the role string forconsistency with the others.
Update sample with a demonstration of replying to all function calls.