Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add in more of the necessary logic on the publish side. #2

Conversation

clalancette
Copy link
Collaborator

That is, make sure to deal with inter-process publishing properly.
This requires us to introduce two copies of
do_intra_process_and_return_shared(), one of which deals with the
ROS Message type and the other that deals with the PublishedType.
This is kind of wasteful, and we may get rid of this later on,
but this works for now.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette [email protected]

This also has the contents of #1 , though it is basically independent of that. I'll rebase once we get that other PR in.

That is, make sure to deal with inter-process publishing properly.
This requires us to introduce two copies of
do_intra_process_and_return_shared(), one of which deals with the
ROS Message type and the other that deals with the PublishedType.
This is kind of wasteful, and we may get rid of this later on,
but this works for now.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
@gonzodepedro gonzodepedro merged commit b9c1009 into gonzodepedro:gonzo/non-transform-intra-process-working-tests Dec 7, 2021
clalancette added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2021
That is, make sure to deal with inter-process publishing properly.
This requires us to introduce two copies of
do_intra_process_and_return_shared(), one of which deals with the
ROS Message type and the other that deals with the PublishedType.
This is kind of wasteful, and we may get rid of this later on,
but this works for now.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
gonzodepedro pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2021
That is, make sure to deal with inter-process publishing properly.
This requires us to introduce two copies of
do_intra_process_and_return_shared(), one of which deals with the
ROS Message type and the other that deals with the PublishedType.
This is kind of wasteful, and we may get rid of this later on,
but this works for now.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>

Make sure to add the appropriate library directory. (#3)

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
clalancette added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2021
That is, make sure to deal with inter-process publishing properly.
This requires us to introduce two copies of
do_intra_process_and_return_shared(), one of which deals with the
ROS Message type and the other that deals with the PublishedType.
This is kind of wasteful, and we may get rid of this later on,
but this works for now.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>

Make sure to add the appropriate library directory. (#3)

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
clalancette added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2022
That is, make sure to deal with inter-process publishing properly.
This requires us to introduce two copies of
do_intra_process_and_return_shared(), one of which deals with the
ROS Message type and the other that deals with the PublishedType.
This is kind of wasteful, and we may get rid of this later on,
but this works for now.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>

Make sure to add the appropriate library directory. (#3)

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants