Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(deps): bump github.com/quasilyte/go-ruleguard from v0.3.19 to v0.4.0 #3999

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2023

Conversation

ldez
Copy link
Member

@ldez ldez commented Aug 10, 2023

related to #3933

quasilyte/go-ruleguard@v0.3.19...v0.4.0

This update is done by hand because dependabot is not able to update a transitive dependency.

@ldez ldez added dependencies Relates to an upstream dependency go Pull requests that update Go code labels Aug 10, 2023
@ldez ldez force-pushed the fix/update-go-ruleguard branch 2 times, most recently from b80235c to e9f1a3e Compare August 10, 2023 09:43
@ldez ldez changed the title build(deps): bump github.com/quasilyte/go-ruleguard from v0.3.19 to v0.3.20 build(deps): bump github.com/quasilyte/go-ruleguard from v0.3.19 to v0.4.0 Aug 10, 2023
@ldez ldez merged commit ea4481a into golangci:master Aug 10, 2023
14 checks passed
@ldez ldez deleted the fix/update-go-ruleguard branch August 10, 2023 10:11
@liggitt
Copy link

liggitt commented Aug 10, 2023

thanks, glad this worked!

I know v1.54.0 was just released, but is it possible to cut v1.54.1 with this and the go-critic bump so latest binaries handle go1.21 properly?

@ldez
Copy link
Member Author

ldez commented Aug 10, 2023

Thank you for the analysis and the fix ❤️

Yes, I will create a new release quickly, I'm just waiting for another linter.

@ldez ldez added this to the v1.54 milestone Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Relates to an upstream dependency go Pull requests that update Go code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants