-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x/tools/gopls/internal/regtest/workspace: failures with ‘Unmet: completed work "diagnosing initial workspace load"’ #50582
Comments
This appears to be more builder-specific than test-specific; maybe it's a bug in the test-runner infrastructure?
|
This means that gopls' initial workspace load is timing out on these builders: Consider the following excerpt from the logs:
I think a reasonable next step is to add additional instrumentation around loading: how long did |
Change https://golang.org/cl/380497 mentions this issue: |
We care that gopls operations complete within a reasonable time. However, what is “reasonable” depends strongly on the specifics of the user and the hardware they are running on: a timeout that would be perfectly reasonable on a high-powered user workstation with little other load may be far too short on an overloaded and/or underpowered CI builder. This change adjusts the regtest runner to use the test deadline instead of an arbitrary, flag-defined timeout; we expect the user or system running the test to scale the test timeout appropriately to the specific platform and system load. When the testing package gains support for per-test timeouts (golang/go#48157), this approach will automatically apply those timeouts too. If we decide that we also want to test specific performance and/or latency targets, we can set up specific configurations for that (as either aggressive per-test timeouts or benchmarks) in a followup change. For golang/go#50582 Change-Id: I1ab11b2049effb097aa620046fe11609269f91c4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/380497 Trust: Bryan Mills <[email protected]> Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <[email protected]> gopls-CI: kokoro <[email protected]> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <[email protected]>
greplogs --dashboard -md -l -e 'FAIL: TestFilters'
2022-01-12T19:47:40-d7a4bb4-f005df8/windows-arm64-10
And then there are a whole lot of
openbsd-386
failures on the builders affected by #49209, which IMO we can safely ignore:2022-01-12T01:49:33-d7a4bb4-3d3f5d9/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-11T18:17:05-d7a4bb4-a20724d/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-11T01:22:53-52e9527-9de1ac6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-10T04:23:42-94bfe68-6df0957/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-09T18:43:51-94bfe68-2639f2f/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-08T00:24:25-94bfe68-90860e0/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-07T17:27:56-94bfe68-9de1ac6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-07T06:34:04-351aaa6-11b28e7/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-07T05:34:58-351aaa6-9de1ac6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-07T01:36:17-a1300ed-c1e7c51/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-06T21:41:55-a1300ed-9de1ac6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-06T16:18:51-4754748-dbdf055/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-06T00:26:47-04daf88-b5bfaf4/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-05T21:22:03-04daf88-2b39d86/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-05T09:50:29-15409b5-2c58bb2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-05T01:53:39-15409b5-301db3f/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-04T20:54:25-15409b5-1242f43/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-03T23:45:12-ee1ca4f-95b240b/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-02T14:27:43-ee1ca4f-c886143/openbsd-386-70
2021-12-29T20:20:32-ee1ca4f-6178d25/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-28T19:29:29-ee1ca4f-1242f43/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-23T20:03:38-8d38310-b357b05/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-23T18:58:36-8d38310-af3b8cf/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-22T18:43:55-8d38310-0f3becf/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-16T11:15:33-8d38310-de690c2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-15T23:51:57-c6ae451-6e7c691/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-15T16:50:15-c6ae451-de690c2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-15T00:33:55-27fc764-9d0ca26/openbsd-386-70
2021-12-15T00:33:55-27fc764-9d0ca26/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-13T22:45:26-27fc764-5b9207f/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-12T06:14:07-27fc764-9c6e8f6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-10T19:26:50-27fc764-766f89b/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-09T17:16:12-27fc764-78b4518/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-09T15:47:16-27fc764-de690c2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-09T13:07:36-3fca6a0-48d9489/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-08T23:38:20-3fca6a0-d6c4583/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-08T18:30:00-3fca6a0-61011de/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-08T16:15:56-3fca6a0-61317ef/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-08T04:14:00-fd2bfb7-a19e72c/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-07T20:13:17-d3358c1-61317ef/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-07T03:44:02-feb39d0-dc65c48/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-06T16:11:25-feb39d0-0f2d0d0/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-04T04:50:55-c882a49-549cfef/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-03T18:55:11-c882a49-c4a8550/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-03T18:55:11-c882a49-0f2d0d0/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-03T01:09:21-e212aff-0985990/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-02T20:02:34-e212aff-0f2d0d0/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-02T16:48:07-e212aff-36be0be/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-01T19:09:57-d99d6fa-0103fd2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-01T15:05:46-615f9a6-b7651e5/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-30T22:42:17-1fd30d2-b7651e5/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-30T22:42:17-1fd30d2-7ccbcc9/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-30T18:09:02-2c9b078-931d80e/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-30T16:43:31-2c9b078-682435d/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-29T20:12:13-6e52f51-b7651e5/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-25T00:07:28-cb80a01-f7e34e7/openbsd-386-70
CC @findleyr
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: