Move gokien.org to a dynamic web framework

[lewtds]

Sooner or later, we'll need a dynamic web framework. Things like interface translation is not easily done with static web. Who knows what we may also need in the future?

[cmpitg]

+1 for this

A simple web framework, moving slowly, add things only needed is my prefered method.

I suggest Nitrogen for damn good fault tolerant, scalability, best architecture and performance (Nginx's design is based on Nitrogen), decent API, but takes time to learn if you don't know Erlang. It doesn't matter for me since we don't need to move in a flash, though.

My second choice is Goliath for stability, good performance, and decent APIs.

[tuanta]

I suggest we use Drupal. It's the best open source CMS/Framework for building dynamic web.
Lot of FOSS community website are currently using Drupal too.

[cmpitg]

-1 on Drupal

We'll need more than just a CMS. And PHP is horrible[1], making extending and maintaining process damn costly. I personally hate PHP with a passion.

[1] http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/

[tuanta]

Hating PHP is just your opinion :).
I can not change the fact the Drupal is widely used all over the world, including a lot of FOSS community sites; and the fact that, there are over 800,000 developers is working on Drupal now.

I personally don't think (see) maintaining a Drupal website is too costly.
All we need to do is keep Drupal core and additional modules up-to-date. That's an easy task, 1-2h per week only.

[cmpitg]

It's not just my opinion but all the current dev in our project too ;-).

Popularity doesn't reflect quality, especially in comparison to resources. We have limited resource right now.

[lewtds]

I'm practically blind in this matter. Whatever you guys choose will do for me. That PHP criticism is awesomely hilarious.

Anw, after some introduction to Erlang, I've found it to be very similar to Haskell.

[tuanta]

If you believe that @cmpitg, we should make a range voting.

[fuzzysource]

I think we should submit prototypes before voting. :))

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Truong Anh Tuan
[email protected]:

If you believe that @cmpitg https://github.com/CMPITG, we should make a
range voting.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/63#issuecomment-20875593
.

Đàm Tiến Long
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/fuzzysource
Homepage: http://fuzzysource.github.com

[cmpitg]

Prototype?

[fuzzysource]

A sample :D

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Nguyễn Hà Dương
[email protected]:

Prototype?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/63#issuecomment-20935397
.

Đàm Tiến Long
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/fuzzysource
Homepage: http://fuzzysource.github.com

[myguidingstar-zz]

I think we should close this issue as we don't need it right now.
IMO proposals should come from bottom up, not top down with pure prediction. Anw, not many people want to learn web programming (Doing both frontend + backend is a huge learning curve!)

[lewtds]

Why should we close it? The non-critical tag is for issues like this.
btw, I want.