Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v3: Consolidate Logic of Handling the Request Body #3093

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2024

Conversation

ad3n
Copy link
Contributor

@ad3n ad3n commented Jul 27, 2024

This PR proposed to reduce redundant call when get request body

@ad3n ad3n requested a review from a team as a code owner July 27, 2024 02:22
@ad3n ad3n requested review from gaby, sixcolors, ReneWerner87 and efectn and removed request for a team July 27, 2024 02:22
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent refactoring of the DefaultCtx struct in a Go application consolidates the logic for handling request bodies by introducing a new method, getBody(). This change eliminates duplicated code in the methods Body() and BodyRaw(), enhancing maintainability and clarity while preserving the original functionality. The update ensures that the request body is retrieved efficiently based on the application's immutability settings.

Changes

File Change Summary
ctx.go Modified the BodyRaw() and Body() methods to call a new getBody() method for body retrieval. The getBody() method centralizes the logic for handling request bodies based on immutability settings.

Poem

🐰 In code so bright, we leap with glee,
A new method shines, to set us free!
Duplicates gone, clarity's gain,
Handling bodies with joy, not pain.
With each little change, our code's a delight,
Hopping towards futures, all shiny and bright! ✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 99173cc and 9a874da.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • ctx.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • ctx.go

@gaby gaby changed the title Reduce redundant call v3: Consolidate Logic of Handling the Request Body Jul 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.67%. Comparing base (99173cc) to head (9a874da).

Files Patch % Lines
ctx.go 85.71% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3093      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.67%   83.67%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines        8344     8342       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         6982     6980       -2     
+ Misses       1039     1038       -1     
- Partials      323      324       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 83.67% <85.71%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@gaby gaby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 added this to the v3 milestone Jul 27, 2024
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit e437633 into gofiber:main Jul 27, 2024
15 of 17 checks passed
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jul 27, 2024

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉 We here at Fiber are proud of you! If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord

@ad3n ad3n deleted the reduce-redundant branch July 27, 2024 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants