Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the documentation for ease() and smoothstep() #52874

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2021

Conversation

Calinou
Copy link
Member

@Calinou Calinou commented Sep 20, 2021

Marked as draft since godotengine/godot-docs#5271 needs to be merged first.

This adds a cheatsheet for ease() and a comparison graph for smoothstep(), among other things.

This closes #10572.

This adds a cheatsheet for `ease()` and a comparison graph for
`smoothstep()`, among other things.
@Calinou Calinou force-pushed the doc-ease-smoothstep branch from 52aa4c3 to 567b643 Compare September 20, 2021 14:08
@mhilbrunner mhilbrunner marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2021 10:31
@mhilbrunner mhilbrunner requested a review from a team as a code owner September 30, 2021 10:31
@mhilbrunner
Copy link
Member

mhilbrunner commented Sep 30, 2021

godotengine/godot-docs#5271 was merged.

Note for cherry-picking: we may want to cherry-pick the above PR and change these links per branch/version to point to the appriopriate docs branches. :)

@akien-mga akien-mga merged commit 998974f into godotengine:master Sep 30, 2021
@akien-mga
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@Calinou Calinou deleted the doc-ease-smoothstep branch September 30, 2021 12:46
@akien-mga
Copy link
Member

Cherry-picked for 3.4.

@akien-mga akien-mga removed the cherrypick:3.x Considered for cherry-picking into a future 3.x release label Oct 1, 2021
@akien-mga
Copy link
Member

Cherry-picked for 3.3.4.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggestion: the ease function should be split / reworked
3 participants