Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extract common code to new template #26903

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

Extract common code to new template #26903

merged 12 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

kerwin612
Copy link
Member

I noticed that the code of several new webhook pages is highly repetitive, so I pulled out the common parts to a new template, unified reference, unified maintenance

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Sep 5, 2023
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 5, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Sep 5, 2023
@lunny lunny added the type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. label Sep 5, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Sep 5, 2023
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 5, 2023
@lunny lunny added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Sep 5, 2023
@lunny lunny enabled auto-merge (squash) September 5, 2023 10:13
@lunny lunny merged commit 65588b7 into go-gitea:main Sep 5, 2023
23 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.22.0 milestone Sep 5, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Sep 5, 2023
@kerwin612 kerwin612 deleted the patch-1 branch September 5, 2023 13:54
@techknowlogick techknowlogick modified the milestones: 1.22.0, 1.21.0 Sep 5, 2023
zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
* giteaofficial/main:
  Add missing translation (go-gitea#26926)
  Vendor `jquery.are-you-sure` with strict mode fixes (go-gitea#26901)
  Fix the secret regexp pattern on web page (go-gitea#26910)
  Add @chenrui333 as maintainer (go-gitea#26917)
  Move notification interface to services layer (go-gitea#26915)
  fetch emails of currently displayed user on admin page (go-gitea#26918)
  Improve LDAP group config documentation, fixes go-gitea#21159 (go-gitea#21227)
  update footer link to new landing page (go-gitea#26916)
  Remove `Named` interface (go-gitea#26913)
  Refactor secrets modification logic (go-gitea#26873)
  Add missing `reqToken()` to notifications endpoints (go-gitea#26914)
  feat(API): add routes and functions for managing user's secrets (go-gitea#26909)
  Move feed notification service layer (go-gitea#26908)
  Extract common code to new template (go-gitea#26903)
  Move ui notification to service layer (go-gitea#26907)
  Remove duplicated notify mail configuration on tests (go-gitea#26912)
  Move indexer notification to service layer (go-gitea#26906)

# Conflicts:
#	templates/base/footer_content.tmpl
lunny pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants