WIP: Versioned docs #17905
WIP: Versioned docs #17905
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17905 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 47.39%
=======================================
Files ? 952
Lines ? 132524
Branches ? 0
=======================================
Hits ? 62807
Misses ? 62145
Partials ? 7572 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
GiteaBot
added
the
lgtm/need 2
Makefile
Outdated
| cd docs; make trans-copy clean build-offline; | ||
| cd docs; make trans-copy clean ; | ||
| #git co release/v1.13 && PUBLIC=public/v1.13 make build-offline ; | ||
| git co release/v1.14 && PUBLIC=public/v1.14 make build-offline ; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we avoid having to hardcode the release branch? Maybe some logic that builds all branches, back to a certain starting branch?
|
Some more users are misled by documents recently, they are asking about why they do not have the registry feature. |
|
I think the final solution for docs will be docusaurus, which has support for versioning, like woodpecker-ci has :) |
|
Done is better than perfect, as long as it can continue to improve without difficulty. If we can use a simple mechanism to split the documents for versions (months ago), then there will be no user asking about strange questions any more, and there is still a chance to improve the versioned document system. Today there is one more user asking about why he doesn't have package feature in discord. |
|
Yeah, I'm not opposed to having some intermediate solution now, just pointing out potential better solutions for the future :) |
|
Today one more |
lunny
force-pushed
the
lunny/versioned_docs
branch
from
7713b29
to
783f865
Compare
No description provided.