-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Exponential Backoff for ByteFIFO #15724
Exponential Backoff for ByteFIFO #15724
Conversation
This PR is another in the vein of queue improvements. It suggests an exponential backoff for bytefifo queues to reduce the load from queue polling. This will mostly be useful for redis queues. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <[email protected]>
Related #15542 |
This could easily be moved in to #15693 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15724 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 43.96% 43.98% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 678 678
Lines 81998 82016 +18
==========================================
+ Hits 36053 36074 +21
+ Misses 40072 40069 -3
Partials 5873 5873
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
small nit but otherwise looks good
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <[email protected]>
This PR is another in the vein of queue improvements. It suggests an exponential backoff for bytefifo queues to reduce the load from queue polling. This will mostly be useful for redis queues. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <[email protected]>
-> #15793 |
This PR is another in the vein of queue improvements. It suggests an exponential backoff for bytefifo queues to reduce the load from queue polling. This will mostly be useful for redis queues. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zeripath <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <[email protected]>
This PR is another in the vein of queue improvements. It suggests an exponential backoff for bytefifo queues to reduce the load from queue polling. This will mostly be useful for redis queues. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <[email protected]>
This PR is another in the vein of queue improvements. It suggests an
exponential backoff for bytefifo queues to reduce the load from queue
polling. This will mostly be useful for redis queues.
Related #15542
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton [email protected]