feat(gnokey): update gnokey verify and tests

[thinhnx-var]

Contributors' checklist...

• Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
• Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
• Updated the official documentation or not needed
• No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
• Added references to related issues and PRs
• Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
• Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

Link to this issue: #2311
This PR changes the Verify() to read the signed doc, verify the exactly original message hash that was signed.
It also adds chainid, account-number, account-sequence config flag to the gnokey verify command.

The sign function now expose the hex-format of signature to the IO in oder to feed the verify as an argument. I think we need better way for user to verify their signed document, which currently need this hex-format (#2272)

What do you think about this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.18519% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.99%. Comparing base (f04ec89) to head (9166f69).
Report is 53 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
tm2/pkg/crypto/keys/client/verify.go	84.61%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2333      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   60.44%   60.99%   +0.55%     
==========================================
  Files         563      564       +1     
  Lines       75159    76006     +847     
==========================================
+ Hits        45427    46358     +931     
+ Misses      26343    26217     -126     
- Partials     3389     3431      +42     

Flag	Coverage Δ
contribs/gnodev	61.46% <ø> (ø)
contribs/gnofaucet	15.31% <ø> (ø)
gno.land	67.92% <ø> (+0.70%)	⬆️
gnovm	65.77% <ø> (+1.30%)	⬆️
misc/genstd	80.54% <ø> (ø)
misc/logos	20.23% <ø> (+0.35%)	⬆️
tm2	62.07% <85.18%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[leohhhn]

Hey @thinhnx-var thanks for this - can you please check why the CI is failing and fix it?

[thinhnx-var]

@leohhhn yeah sure. Maybe CI failed because CI-Lint. I gonna fix it up.

[thinhnx-var]

@leohhhn
Can you please review this. I ( and I think others) have problems when using current version of gno sign so I think it should be good to merge this.

[leohhhn]

Hey! I will take a look. Please stop clicking "merge master". This is annoying and spammy, and will not get your PR reviewed faster. You should only merge in master if there are conflicts to be resolved.

[jefft0]

Removed the "review team" label because this is already reviewed by leohhhn.