chore: add code facilitators ci

[0xtekgrinder]

Add a system based on #1466 issue that add a CODEFACILITATORS file and a script to assign PRs similar to how code owners works and add a message to the PR explaining their roles.

It uses a github action created for this specific purpose in https://github.com/0xtekgrinder/codefacilitators

The logic of the action is located in https://github.com/0xtekgrinder/codefacilitators/blob/main/src/main.ts

Contributors' checklist...

• Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
• Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
• Updated the official documentation or not needed
• No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
• Added references to related issues and PRs
• Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
• Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.11%. Comparing base (f233d52) to head (6322bf8).
Report is 542 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1660      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.35%   56.11%   +2.75%     
==========================================
  Files         480      447      -33     
  Lines       72597    66712    -5885     
==========================================
- Hits        38735    37435    -1300     
+ Misses      30855    26362    -4493     
+ Partials     3007     2915      -92     

Flag	Coverage Δ
go-1.22.x	∅ <ø> (∅)
misc	∅ <ø> (∅)
misc-_test.genstd	∅ <ø> (∅)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[0xtekgrinder]

@moul pinging it up as it has been a long time it has been staled

[thehowl]

Hey @0xtekgrinder, apologies for the long delay, as usual.

I've taken a look at the PR; aside from being in a third-party non established repo (if you have to do actions: I'd prefer if we centralize them in this repository so we can tweak them at will), I think we want to go longer term for something different.

I'll be commenting now also on #1466. Apologies for the long wait and for the late reject.