Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: s/Gnolang/Gno, s/Golang/Go #1548

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

docs: s/Gnolang/Gno, s/Golang/Go #1548

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

thehowl
Copy link
Member

@thehowl thehowl commented Jan 17, 2024

They're Gno and Go. The "lang" part should be used only for disambiguation. Same as we don't call C "Clang", Java "Javalang" and so on.

Arguably, we could drop "gnolang" completely outside maybe of internal usage in the code, as contrary to Go, "Gno" is not a common verb in the english language.

@thehowl thehowl requested review from a team as code owners January 17, 2024 17:55
@thehowl thehowl added the 📖 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@leohhhn leohhhn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I think this makes sense. Let's try to keep it as Gno whenever we can.

@leohhhn leohhhn merged commit 34556c4 into master Jan 18, 2024
6 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 📖 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 18, 2024
@leohhhn leohhhn deleted the dev/morgan/docs-make-it-go branch January 18, 2024 16:17
thehowl added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2024
More on my crusade for right terminology and avoid dooming us to have
"gnolang" as the official language name.

See-also #1548
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants