feat: official documentation

[zivkovicmilos]

Description

This PR introduces the official Gno documentation, which will be hosted at docs.gno.land, using the Docusaurus framework.

As discussed with @moul, the docs are supposed to be framework agnostic, with Docusaurus living in the misc/docusaurus directory.

This documentation also includes work done by @alexiscolin, @leohhhn, @waymobetta, @harry-hov, and the Onbloc team (@dongwon8247 and @r3v4s, migrated from their Developer Portal).
Thank you to everyone who contributed and got us to this point, for the v1 of the docs 🙏

@leohhhn @waymobetta (and DevRels reading this in the future), full ownership of the documentation will be relinquished to you after this PR is merged out.

To run the docs locally:

• cd misc/docusaurus
• yarn install
• yarn start

Contributors' checklist...

• Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
• Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
• Updated the official documentation or not needed
• No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
• Added references to related issues and PRs
• Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
• Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

[waymobetta]

Left some very minor observations but otherwise looks awesome. Excited to get this merged so we can build on it 💪

[moul]

Could you please:

1. Keep the docs/ folder clean, avoiding js/css configurations there. Consider using misc/ for that purpose.
2. Use a simple docs/ folder instead of docs/gno-docs for clarity.
3. Ensure user-friendly documentation within docs/, focusing on clear filenames and readable Markdown.
4. Confirm plans for future documentation testing and how it will be implemented.

Thanks

[albttx]

Following @moul idea about the name, what do you think about having a directory on the root of the folder named docs.gnolang.com since we already have a docs folder ?

once ready, i'll deploy it :) (don't hesitate to also ping if you need a pre-production on it :) )

[moul]

blocking so I can review before merging, thank you.

[wolkykim]

This is great 👍

[zivkovicmilos]

@moul @thehowl

I've started resolving comments on this PR, and will ping you once it's ready for a final glance 🚀

I apologize it's taken this long, somehow something more important has always kept popping up, which took time away from this PR 🙏

@moul @thehowl All conversations should be addressed, please check 🙏

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9c8f248) 55.95% compared to head (5e9b9d2) 55.92%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1046      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.95%   55.92%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       65415    65415              
==========================================
- Hits        36606    36583      -23     
- Misses      25951    25970      +19     
- Partials     2858     2862       +4     

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[thehowl]

Approving for a speedy merge. Once merged, I'll add to my tasklist to do another thorough review as a PR.

GitHub seems to be complaining about the CODEOWNERS file being invalid; don't know if this arises from manfred trying to move around some groups. Might be worth adding a final newline to the CODEOWNERS file (:shrug:).

Go go go! 🚀 🚀 🚀