-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Our mission
The goal of this tutorial is to learn how to use the Checker Framework, and specifically the Nullness Checker in a real-world project.
Ideally, once we’re done we can be sure that our code is safe from
NullPointerException
s.
The Nullness Checker’s promise is that once it
issues no warnings for a given program, then running that program will never throw a null pointer exception.
To keep that promise it needs a little help from us, the programmer. We need to
make some of our knowledge of nullness in the program explicit by annotating
types as either
@Nullable
(possibly null
) or
@NonNull
(never null
).
As an illustration, the signature of makeSlug
from the introduction is really
public static @NonNull String makeSlug(@NonNull String s)
and the signature of getTitle
, if it might return null
, is properly
public @Nullable String getTitle()
In a sense, these annotations are like an additional, refined type system placed
on top of the Java one. Something that has a type that includes the null
value
(the result of getTitle
, @Nullable String
) is obviously not compatible with
a type that cannot hold a null
value (the parameter of makeSlug
, @NonNull String
). We can think of these annotations as constituting a pluggable type
system. The Nullness Checker’s job is to make sure our program is type-safe
with respect to this nullness type system.
Now, it would be pretty tedious if we had to annotate every reference as either
@Nullable
or @NonNull
. As a convenience, the Nullness Checker makes a
reasonable assumption about the types of references: every unannotated reference
is assumed to be @NonNull
by default.
Just to make sure we’re on the same page, a quick word on why this assumption makes sense: let’s talk about null-safe programming practice.
The first rule of null-safe programming is don’t use null
.
Simply put, if you don’t use null
you won’t get NullPointerException
s. Code
that doesn’t need to deal with null references is not only safer, but also more
concise. Others have explained this
well. A
number of strategies exist to avoid using null, such as using null-objects
instead, returning empty collections or
Optional
instead of null
, failing fast when receiving null
arguments, and insisting
on limiting the scope of nullable references where they cannot be avoided. Check
the References for more on this topic.
If avoidance of null
is our goal and guiding principle, then we can sensibly
assume that all references are not null
by default. The case that we want to
stand out in code is really the nullable reference. That’s where we must be on
our toes and guard against attempts to dereference it.
Helpfully, the Nullness Checker shares this attitude towards nullability. In the
eyes of the Nullness Checker, every type use carries an implicit @NonNull
annotation. It’s the nullable references that need to be marked up as
@Nullable
– and that is what we are going to do.
Enough theory, let’s get started.
Our mission is to learn how to use the Nullness Checker, and we’re going to learn this by integrating it into a real-world (work with me) project.
This project is a snapshot of the Spring Framework’s Pet Clinic sample web app.
The Pet Clinic isn’t a project anybody will be passionate about, but it has some characteristics that make it a good choice.
- The Pet Clinic has some typical enterprisey bits to it which many programmers must (for better or worse) work with every day.
- The Pet Clinic is a typical legacy software project. There’s bound to be some shoddy code in there and that’s for the Checker Framework to chew into.
- At 1600 lines of code it is just the right size.
Ok, on to checking out the code and setting up the project on the next page.