Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Russian locale #493

Closed

Conversation

markelog
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

"currency-label": "Независимая валюта",
"date-label": "Независимая дата",
"relative-time-label": "Независимое относительное время",
"message-1": "Пример сообщения со смешанными числами \"{number}\", валютой \"{currency}\", датами \"{date}\", и относительным временем \"{relativeTime}\".",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@markelog, лишняя запятая перед "и" в перечислении датами \"{date}\", и относительным временем.

@sompylasar
Copy link

The travis builds fail because of the malformed commit messages. They should start with a component name (looks like the maintainers use "Examples: ").

@markelog
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just got schooled by the @sompylasar :-), anyway, fixed

@markelog markelog force-pushed the russian branch 3 times, most recently from 73db388 to 0b758e8 Compare August 26, 2015 22:05
"Пример сообщения с поддержкой множественного числа:",
"{count, plural,",
" one {У вас осталась одна задача}",
" many {У вас осталось # задач}",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You've missed the "few" class. Please refer to the table here: http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/latest/supplemental/language_plural_rules.html#ru

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it be picked up by other?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, it might be. But I'd rather put in all the classes, this is an example and it should not contain ambiguities or unclear defaults.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rxaviers what is your preference?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@markelog, technically you are correct other would pick it up.

I tend to agree with @sompylasar that it's good to make all ru forms explicit: i.e., one, few, many, other for the clarity of the demo.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@rxaviers
Copy link
Member

Awesome, thank you @markelog. Thanks @sompylasar too.

@jzaefferer
Copy link
Contributor

Btw. I also removed the "Standalone" part in the German translation. Might be worth considering to drop it in the English version as well.

@rxaviers
Copy link
Member

Btw. I also removed the "Standalone" part in the German translation. Might be worth considering to drop it in the English version as well.

👍 will do that

@rxaviers
Copy link
Member

Merged into #481

@rxaviers rxaviers closed this Aug 27, 2015
rxaviers pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants