Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] render-portal, replaces in-element for wormhole support #334

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

runspired
Copy link
Contributor

@runspired runspired commented Oct 14, 2016

The in-element API provided by @rwjblue in #331 was insufficient to support ember-wormhole and flexi. I have not yet done work to see if this PR will fix flexi, but it does fix wormhole and I'm reasonably confident it at least gets us closer to supporting that library.

in-element deficiencies

  • no support for renderInPlace
  • no ability to move the DOM from one remote target to another remote target or from a remote target to in-place.

naming

The wormhole concept has often been referred to as a "portal" or "portal-ing" in other frameworks and in talks. I'm also particularly partial to the game Portal.

toJSON(): OpcodeJSON {
return {
guid: this._guid,
type: this.type
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I probably am missing things here, but I didn't know enough to know what all should be here.

@runspired
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tests are passing locally, on sauce labs, and on travis, but some vscode tslint build thing is erring out and kicking it a few times didn't help.

@chadhietala
Copy link
Member

@runspired If you go to [email protected] instead of typescript@next it will fix the issues.

@runspired
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chadhietala thanks!

@runspired
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chancancode I can rebase this, but I'm pretty sure what I spiked here needs refinement. I'd love a review, and pointers in the right direction, so we can make sure that wormhole et al. using this technique have a good story in Glimmer.

@rwjblue
Copy link
Member

rwjblue commented Aug 15, 2017

@runspired - I think we should probably close this specific PR (its out of date, and will be hard to bring it back into alignment with current master without just redoing the work), but we should make an issue that documents the shortfalls around in-element so that we can collectively decide on the right way forward...

@tomdale
Copy link
Contributor

tomdale commented Oct 16, 2017

Closing this as it seems to have gone stale. We're definitely still open to improving {{in-element}} to support more use cases, but this part of the code has changed quite a bit recently.

@tomdale tomdale closed this Oct 16, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants