Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/pass args to debugger #1665

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wycats
Copy link
Contributor

@wycats wycats commented Nov 19, 2024

This commit eliminates debugger infrastructure that derived from the old partial/eval infrastructure.

Instead, it passes the in-scope values as a constant to the debugger wire format opcode and uses it directly in the scope inspector.

This will be followed up with support for accessing strict-mode lexical variables.

This commit eliminates debugger infrastructure that derived from the old
partial/eval infrastructure.

Instead, it passes the in-scope values as a constant to the `debugger`
wire format opcode and uses it directly in the scope inspector.

This will be followed up with support for accessing strict-mode lexical
variables.
@wycats wycats force-pushed the feature/pass-args-to-debugger branch from 721888c to 99d0232 Compare November 19, 2024 21:46
@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Contributor

local perf test shows no difference compared to main 🎉

Copy link
Contributor

@NullVoxPopuli NullVoxPopuli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dang, this is way cleaner!

@NullVoxPopuli NullVoxPopuli merged commit 589945a into main Nov 19, 2024
5 checks passed
@NullVoxPopuli NullVoxPopuli deleted the feature/pass-args-to-debugger branch November 19, 2024 22:59
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants