Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix: Initial amount when adding a member (kids-1151) #871

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2024

Conversation

Daniela510
Copy link
Contributor

@Daniela510 Daniela510 commented Jul 4, 2024

Description

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the initial allowance value in the Add Member Form to be dynamically set, enhancing flexibility and customization options for users.

@Daniela510 Daniela510 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 4, 2024 13:20
Copy link
Contributor

ellipsis-dev bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Your free trial has expired. To keep using Ellipsis, sign up at https://app.ellipsis.dev for $20/seat/month or reach us at [email protected]

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes primarily revolve around making the initial allowance value in the AllowanceCounter widget dynamic, based on the _allowance variable instead of a hardcoded value. This change allows for greater flexibility and maintainability by enabling the initial allowance to be easily updated.

Changes

Files Change Summary
lib/features/children/add_member/widgets/add_member_form.dart Updated the initialization of _allowance from 15 to 5, and modified the AllowanceCounter to use _allowance as initial value instead of a hardcoded 5.

Poem

🐇
In code, a shift so small, yet bright,
From fifteen, now to five, just right.
The allowance counter does now flex,
With variables, it's more complex.
Here's to updates, big and slight,
In software's ever-changing light.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30a3fdf and 2b26090.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/features/children/add_member/widgets/add_member_form.dart (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lib/features/children/add_member/widgets/add_member_form.dart

@Daniela510 Daniela510 merged commit 79b8a14 into develop Jul 4, 2024
1 check passed
@Daniela510 Daniela510 deleted the bug/kids-1151-default-amount-update branch July 4, 2024 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants