Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dashboard] remove deprecated tailwind-filter #10268

Conversation

flaming-codes
Copy link

Description

Remove the depreacted tailwind-filters package and replace its usage w/ native tailwind utility classes.

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #10004

How to test

No specific test for these styles are available.

Release Notes

NONE

Documentation

@flaming-codes flaming-codes changed the title [dashboard] remove deprecated tailwind filter [dashboard] remove deprecated tailwind-filter May 25, 2022
@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

gtsiolis commented May 26, 2022

Looking at this now! 👀

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-chore-remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter-fork.0
(with .werft/ from main)

Copy link
Contributor

@gtsiolis gtsiolis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for contributing, @flaming-codes! ✨

Changes look good! However, the filters from tailwind do not seem to work over SVG images. Wondering if this is a known issue since [filter] property is expected to work with SVGs, too. 💭

Login Login (Repository) First time log in modal Preferences
Screenshot 2022-05-26 at 3 40 47 PM (2) Screenshot 2022-05-26 at 3 40 43 PM (2) Screenshot 2022-05-26 at 3 41 41 PM (2) Screenshot 2022-05-26 at 3 41 51 PM (2)

Let me spin up another preview environment instance below.

@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

gtsiolis commented May 26, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-chore-remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter-fork.1
(with .werft/ from main)

@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

gtsiolis commented May 26, 2022

You'll also need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA)[1] once before merging your first contribution. Looping in @meysholdt to reach out about the CLA. 🏓

@gtsiolis gtsiolis added the do-not-merge/cla-pending CLA has not been signed label May 26, 2022
@flaming-codes
Copy link
Author

Added missing utility class, as required by Tailwind 2.x. Whenever we upgrade to 3.x, the filter-utility can be removed.

Login Providers
Screenshot 2022-05-26 at 22 37 16 Screenshot 2022-05-26 at 22 36 46

@flaming-codes flaming-codes requested a review from gtsiolis May 26, 2022 20:43
@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

gtsiolis commented May 27, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-chore-remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter-fork.2
(with .werft/ from main)

@flaming-codes
Copy link
Author

flaming-codes commented May 27, 2022

/werft run

👎 not authorized

@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

gtsiolis commented May 30, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-chore-remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter-fork.3
(with .werft/ from main)

@gtsiolis gtsiolis force-pushed the chore/remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter branch from aba25af to 8f7302c Compare May 30, 2022 10:27
@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

gtsiolis commented May 30, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-chore-remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter-fork.4
(with .werft/ from main)

@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

gtsiolis commented May 30, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-chore-remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter-fork.5
(with .werft/ from main)

@gtsiolis gtsiolis force-pushed the chore/remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter branch from 8f7302c to 2aa0516 Compare May 30, 2022 16:39
@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

gtsiolis commented May 30, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-chore-remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter-fork.6
(with .werft/ from main)

@flaming-codes
Copy link
Author

@meysholdt I would really like to sign the CLA so that I can continue contributing to Gitpod. My email is [email protected]. Thanks!

@aboqasem
Copy link

Hi @flaming-codes, here are the instructions on signing the CLA.

@flaming-codes
Copy link
Author

Hi @flaming-codes, here are the instructions on signing the CLA.

I already signed the CLA, is there anything more to do? Thanks!

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 27, 2022

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Jun 27, 2022
@gtsiolis gtsiolis removed the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Jun 30, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 10, 2022

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Jul 10, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Jul 11, 2022
@flaming-codes
Copy link
Author

@gtsiolis What's the status on this from your side? I signed the CLA a long time ago, is there anything to do on my part? Thanks!

@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

@flaming-codes Did you receive a CLA doc to sign from @meysholdt as described in #10268 (comment)? I've also asked the team internally to confirm.

@flaming-codes
Copy link
Author

@flaming-codes Did you receive a CLA doc to sign from @meysholdt as described in #10268 (comment)? I've also asked the team internally to confirm.

Yes, and I signed it some weeks ago.

@gtsiolis gtsiolis removed their request for review July 22, 2022 17:19
@meysholdt
Copy link
Member

hi @flaming-codes, I checked, but we don't have a signed CLA from your on record. Maybe that is because the link from the comments above points to Googles CLA and not to Gitpods CLA. Apologies for the confustion. Can you please sign our CLA via this DocuSign form? If there are any questions, you can reach me via [email protected].

meysholdt added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2022
Delete this file because it led to confusion in #10268 (comment)
@meysholdt meysholdt mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2022
1 task
@flaming-codes
Copy link
Author

hi @flaming-codes, I checked, but we don't have a signed CLA from your on record. Maybe that is because the link from the comments above points to Googles CLA and not to Gitpods CLA. Apologies for the confustion. Can you please sign our CLA via this DocuSign form? If there are any questions, you can reach me via [email protected].

@meysholdt Great, thanks! I signed the doc provided by the link.

@meysholdt meysholdt added cla: accepted ✔️ and removed do-not-merge/cla-pending CLA has not been signed labels Jul 26, 2022
@meysholdt
Copy link
Member

Awesome, thank you! I've received the signed CLA and filed a PR to remove the misleading instructions: #11646

roboquat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2022
Delete this file because it led to confusion in #10268 (comment)
@jankeromnes
Copy link
Contributor

jankeromnes commented Aug 1, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-chore-remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter-fork.7
(with .werft/ from main)

@jankeromnes
Copy link
Contributor

jankeromnes commented Aug 1, 2022

/werft run with-preview

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-chore-remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter-fork.8
(with .werft/ from main)

flaming-codes pushed a commit to flaming-codes/gitpod that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2022
Delete this file because it led to confusion in gitpod-io#10268 (comment)
@flaming-codes
Copy link
Author

Due to the lack of action for a final review and me atm not having the necessary time to further work on it, I'm closing this PR.

@flaming-codes flaming-codes deleted the chore/remove-deprecated-tailwind-filter branch August 1, 2022 20:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Removed deprecated library in favor of the new grayscale filters in tailwind
6 participants