Why are XML and INI treated differently in statistics? #5217
-
The readme states:
I am trying to determine why XML and INI files are treated differently in language statistics. The quoted sentence says that data files are excluded, yet XML shows up in language statistics (for example, for this repository) even without any overrides. At the same time, INI, another So what is going on here? I'm not sure whether this is a bug, or intended behaviour. Firstly, why does XML show up in statistics even though it is of type |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
This is happening because that repo was last touched over eight years ago. This predates XML being marked as a data language six years ago. Repos are only analysed when changes are pushed to them.
It should do. There are a few reasons why it may not, in order of likelihood:
Show us the repo with the override in place where you're seeing this and we can take a look. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This is happening because that repo was last touched over eight years ago. This predates XML being marked as a data language six years ago. Repos are only analysed when changes are pushed to them.
It should do. There are a few reasons why it may not, in order of likelihood: