Consider licensing under a more permissive license

[hacker1024]

Using the LGPL license will allow developers to use this package (leaving it open-source) without having to license their entire app under the GPL license.

Permission would be required from all contributors: @jgilfn

[vleeuwenmenno]

I am not familiar with it but I read that LGPL states the used library must be replaceable. Thus static linking isn't possible.
I am uncertain that Dart can do such a thing as it's unlike C/C++ but there might be other scenarios where this would apply in Dart.

[hacker1024]

I see. Are there any more permissive licenses you'd be open to switching to?

[gilnobrega]

@jgilfn is another account that I used in a commit by mistake. I'd be willing to change to an Apache2.0 license, are you ok with that? Is there any advantage of choosing MIT over Apache2.0?

[hacker1024]

They're pretty similar, so I don't mind. The MIT is simpler and seems more popular in the Dart community.

Thanks!

[gilnobrega]

It is very popular in the dart community. Let me think about it for a day.

[gilnobrega]

Feel free to make a PR if you wish to add your name to the LICENSE file

[hacker1024]

I don't need my name in the LICENSE. Thanks!