Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not generate a name if Name tag already given so that we can never confuse the values #35

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2023

Conversation

AndiDog
Copy link
Contributor

@AndiDog AndiDog commented Feb 15, 2023

Same change as applied to CAPA. This way, we don't have 2 distinct values for one semantic meaning, reducing chances to introduce bugs. The related issue giantswarm/roadmap#1866 should already have been solved by #31.

Not tested, since it's a trivial change that we confirmed working in very similar CAPA code.

Checklist

  • Update changelog in CHANGELOG.md. => Code change is internal, so I didn't touch the changelog.
  • Make sure values.yaml and values.schema.json are valid.

@AndiDog AndiDog requested a review from a team February 15, 2023 20:49
Copy link
Member

@fiunchinho fiunchinho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd drop a note in the changelog about this. Other than that, LGTM.

@AndiDog AndiDog merged commit ee62adb into main Feb 22, 2023
@AndiDog AndiDog deleted the name-confusion branch February 22, 2023 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants