added FrameMetrics to Android profiling data

[stefanosiano]

📜 Description

added ProfileMeasurements to AndroidTransactionProfiler and ProfilingTraceData
added frameMetrics (slow and frozen frames) and screen refresh rate to profiling measurements
added a SentryFrameMetricsCollector to collect frameMetrics
changed a benchmark device on Saucelabs as it's not available anymore

💡 Motivation and Context

We want to add data to profiles. So we're starting reporting all slow and frozen frames
Oneplus 7 pro on Saucelabs is not available anymore, and i replaced it with Oneplus 7T

💚 How did you test it?

Added Unit and Ui tests

📝 Checklist

• I reviewed the submitted code
• I added tests to verify the changes
• I updated the docs if needed
• No breaking changes

🔮 Next steps

[github-actions]

	Messages
📖	Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against bf05cd0

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	342.91 ms	377.74 ms	34.83 ms
Size	1.73 MiB	2.33 MiB	612.76 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
f809aac	301.51 ms	346.60 ms	45.09 ms
a04f788	321.78 ms	354.12 ms	32.35 ms
38e4f11	358.20 ms	433.73 ms	75.53 ms
507f924	342.51 ms	402.65 ms	60.14 ms
90e9745	314.68 ms	357.28 ms	42.60 ms
7597ded	289.60 ms	339.69 ms	50.09 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
f809aac	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	608.63 KiB
a04f788	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	609.88 KiB
38e4f11	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	609.82 KiB
507f924	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	609.95 KiB
90e9745	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	608.63 KiB
7597ded	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	609.88 KiB

Previous results on branch: feat/profiling-frame-metrics

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
43860fd	297.76 ms	330.25 ms	32.49 ms
9385630	313.85 ms	319.06 ms	5.21 ms
4d7bda6	338.96 ms	461.37 ms	122.41 ms
a6b6b98	370.26 ms	459.67 ms	89.41 ms
b1b2eb0	315.10 ms	349.81 ms	34.71 ms
5711c14	298.11 ms	323.40 ms	25.30 ms
e7e2fb1	317.90 ms	353.63 ms	35.73 ms
5b4c2f3	319.28 ms	356.79 ms	37.52 ms
922e325	360.50 ms	405.19 ms	44.69 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
43860fd	1.73 MiB	2.33 MiB	612.62 KiB
9385630	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	612.50 KiB
4d7bda6	1.73 MiB	2.33 MiB	612.74 KiB
a6b6b98	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	612.52 KiB
b1b2eb0	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	612.50 KiB
5711c14	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	612.50 KiB
e7e2fb1	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	612.50 KiB
5b4c2f3	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	612.52 KiB
922e325	1.73 MiB	2.32 MiB	612.55 KiB

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 80.33% // Head: 80.28% // Decreases project coverage by -0.04% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (bf05cd0) compared to base (84f0ef1).
Patch coverage: 60.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2342      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     80.33%   80.28%   -0.05%     
- Complexity     3673     3690      +17     
============================================
  Files           290      292       +2     
  Lines         13729    13845     +116     
  Branches       1810     1833      +23     
============================================
+ Hits          11029    11116      +87     
- Misses         2003     2014      +11     
- Partials        697      715      +18     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...sentry/profilemeasurements/ProfileMeasurement.java	52.72% <52.72%> (ø)
...y/profilemeasurements/ProfileMeasurementValue.java	58.33% <58.33%> (ø)
...ry/src/main/java/io/sentry/ProfilingTraceData.java	78.36% <92.30%> (+3.04%)	⬆️
sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/JsonSerializer.java	97.97% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
...ntry/src/main/java/io/sentry/JsonObjectReader.java	82.50% <0.00%> (+2.50%)	⬆️
.../main/java/io/sentry/ProfilingTransactionData.java	52.52% <0.00%> (+10.10%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[romtsn]

I like this approach, we should probably also switch over in the ActivityFramesTracker, because for now we're just using hardcoded 16ms for detecting slow frames

[romtsn]

Not in this PR of course :)