Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the ability to register multiple OptionsConfiguration beans. #1093

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 4, 2020

Conversation

maciejwalkowiak
Copy link
Contributor

@maciejwalkowiak maciejwalkowiak commented Dec 3, 2020

📢 Type of change

  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactoring

📜 Description

Followup to #1084. Makes it possible to register multiple OptionsConfiguration.

Additionally, makes InAppIncludesResolver#resolveInAppIncludes so that it can be used in custom auto-configurations by users.

💡 Motivation and Context

Issue #1080.

Currently when creating custom OptionsConfiguration bean, users have to either opt-out from the default behavior or replicate it even when they need just to set single custom property.

💚 How did you test it?

Unit tests.

📝 Checklist

  • I reviewed submitted code
  • I added tests to verify changes
  • All tests passing
  • No breaking changes

🔮 Next steps

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
* Enhancement: Resolve in-app-includes and in-app-excludes parameters from the external configuration
* Enhancement: Make InAppIncludesResolver public (#1084)
* Ref: Change "op" to "operation" in @SentrySpan and @SentryTransaction
* Enhancement: Add the ability to register multiple OptionsConfiguration beans (#1093)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

L: can we just call it feat: like in the other repos at Sentry?
Enhancement takes up a lot of space of the changelog

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feature is something different than enhancement AFAIK. Perhaps "enc"?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants