Add Admin settings tests #2422
Add Admin settings tests #2422
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
tests/pw/types/environment.d.ts (1)
29-32: Add JSDoc comments to document these environment variables.
The type definitions look good, but please consider adding documentation to explain:
- The purpose of these credentials
- Where to obtain them (Vonage Console, Facebook Developer Portal)
- Any required format or restrictions
Example documentation:
/** Vonage API Key obtained from the Vonage Console for SMS gateway testing */
VONAGE_API_KEY: string;
/** Vonage API Secret obtained from the Vonage Console for SMS gateway testing */
VONAGE_API_SECRET: string;
/** Facebook App ID obtained from the Facebook Developer Portal for social login testing */
FB_APP_ID: string;
/** Facebook App Secret obtained from the Facebook Developer Portal for social login testing */
FB_APP_SECRET: string;tests/pw/tests/e2e/coupons.spec.ts (1)
54-56: Improve documentation for skipped test
The skip reason "Has dokan issues" is too vague. Please provide more context about:
- What specific issues are preventing this test from running?
- Is there a related issue tracker ticket?
- What are the conditions required to enable this test?
- test.skip(true, 'Has dokan issues');
+ test.skip(true, 'DOKAN-XXX: Describe the specific blocker or condition preventing test execution');tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts (2)
68-70: Maintain consistent naming between test case and method.
The test case uses "colors" (plural) while the method name uses "color" (singular). Consider aligning these for consistency:
- test('admin can set Dokan colors settings', { tag: ['@pro', '@admin'] }, async () => {
+ test('admin can set Dokan color settings', { tag: ['@pro', '@admin'] }, async () => {
await admin.setDokanColorSettings(data.dokanSettings.colors.predefinedPalette.tree);
});94-96: Consider adding cleanup for social API settings.
Similar to the email verification test, consider adding a cleanup step to reset the social API settings after the test to prevent potential side effects in subsequent test runs.
Example cleanup:
test('admin can set Dokan social api settings', { tag: ['@pro', '@admin'] }, async () => {
await admin.setDokanSocialApiSettings(data.dokanSettings.socialApi);
+ // reset settings
+ await dbUtils.setOptionValue(dbData.dokan.optionName.socialApi, dbData.dokan.socialApiSettings);
});tests/pw/tests/e2e/_env.setup.ts (1)
111-111: Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose.
Adding a comment explaining why disabling the task list reminder bar is necessary for the test environment would improve maintainability.
+ // Disable WooCommerce task list reminder bar to prevent UI interference during tests
setup('disable woocommerce task list reminder bar', { tag: ['@lite'] }, async () => {tests/pw/utils/testData.ts (1)
2316-2330: LGTM! Consider enhancing gateway configuration.
The SMS verification gateway configuration is well-implemented. Consider:
- Adding TypeScript type definitions for the gateway configuration
- Creating an interface for message templates to ensure consistency
Example type definitions:
interface SmsGatewayConfig {
activeGateway: 'nexmo' | 'twilio';
senderName: string;
smsText: string;
smsSentSuccess: string;
smsSentError: string;
vonage: {
apiKey: string;
apiSecret: string;
};
// Future gateway configurations
twilio?: {
accountSid: string;
authToken: string;
};
}
interface MessageTemplate {
text: string;
successMessage: string;
errorMessage: string;
}tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (3)
Line range hint 2318-2381: Consider grouping related selectors into separate interfaces/types for better organization.
The SMS gateway and social API selectors could be better organized by grouping them into separate TypeScript interfaces or types. This would improve code maintainability and make the structure clearer.
Consider refactoring like this:
+ interface SmsGatewaySelectors {
+ senderName: string;
+ smsText: string;
+ smsSentSuccess: string;
+ smsSentError: string;
+ activeGateway: (gateway: string) => string;
+ enableGateway: (gateway: string) => string;
+ expandButton: string;
+ vonage: {
+ apiKey: string;
+ apiSecret: string;
+ };
+ twilio: {
+ fromNumber: string;
+ accountSid: string;
+ authToken: string;
+ SMSCodeTypeNumeric: string;
+ SMSCodeTypeAlphanumeric: string;
+ };
+ }
+ interface SocialApiSelectors {
+ enableSocialLogin: string;
+ enableSocialApi: (platform: string) => string;
+ expandButton: (platform: string) => string;
+ facebook: {
+ appId: string;
+ appSecret: string;
+ };
+ twitter: {
+ consumerKey: string;
+ consumerSecret: string;
+ };
+ google: {
+ clientId: string;
+ clientSecret: string;
+ };
+ linked: {
+ clientId: string;
+ clientSecret: string;
+ };
+ apple: {
+ appleServiceId: string;
+ appleTeamId: string;
+ appleKeyId: string;
+ appleKeyContent: string;
+ };
+ }
- verificationSmsGateway: {
- senderName: 'input#dokan_verification_sms_gateways\\[sender_name\\]',
- // ... rest of the selectors
- }
+ verificationSmsGateway: SmsGatewaySelectors;
+ socialApi: SocialApiSelectors;This would make the code more maintainable and provide better TypeScript type checking.
Line range hint 2318-2381: Consider making selectors more specific and consistent.
The selectors could be made more specific and follow a more consistent naming pattern:
- Some selectors like
expandButtonare generic and could conflict with other elements - Inconsistent use of XPath vs CSS selectors (e.g.,
senderNameuses CSS whileapiKeyuses XPath)
Consider making these adjustments:
- expandButton: 'div.expand_btn span.dashicons',
+ smsGatewayExpandButton: 'div.expand_btn span.dashicons',
- apiKey: '//h3[normalize-space(text())="API Key"]/../..//input',
+ apiKey: 'input#dokan_verification_sms_gateways_api_key',This would make the selectors more maintainable and less prone to conflicts.
Line range hint 2318-2381: Consider adding selectors for error states and validation messages.
The current selectors focus on form fields but lack corresponding error state and validation message selectors. These would be valuable for testing form validation.
Consider adding selectors like:
+ // SMS Gateway error states
+ senderNameError: '.dokan-error-msg[data-field="sender_name"]',
+ smsTextError: '.dokan-error-msg[data-field="sms_text"]',
+ apiKeyError: '.dokan-error-msg[data-field="api_key"]',
+ // Social API validation
+ socialApiValidationError: '.dokan-social-api-error',
+ socialApiConnectionError: '.dokan-social-api-connection-error',This would enable more comprehensive testing of error handling and validation scenarios.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/couponsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/_env.setup.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/coupons.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/types/environment.d.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/dbUtils.ts (0 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/interfaces.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/testData.ts (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- tests/pw/utils/dbUtils.ts
🔇 Additional comments (14)
tests/pw/types/environment.d.ts (1)
29-32: Verify environment variable handling in test setup.
The credentials look properly typed, but let's verify they're being handled securely in the test setup.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how these environment variables are loaded and used in the test setup.
Based on the results, I can see that the environment variables are properly handled in the test setup:
- The variables are only used as type definitions in
environment.d.ts - They are properly loaded from
process.envintestData.ts - No hardcoded credentials are found (only test credit card numbers which are public test values)
- The variables are used appropriately in test configurations and test files
Let me verify one final aspect - checking for any potential credential leaks in environment setup files.
Environment variables are properly handled in test setup ✅
The verification shows that:
- Environment variables are properly typed in
environment.d.ts - Variables are loaded securely using
dotenvin test configurations - No credentials are hardcoded or leaked in setup files
- Variables are accessed safely through
process.env - Only test credit card numbers (which are public test values) are present in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper environment variable handling in test setup
# and ensure credentials are not hardcoded
# Check for environment variable usage in test setup files
echo "Checking for environment variable usage in test files..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' -A 5 'VONAGE_API|FB_APP' tests/
# Check for potential credential leaks
echo "Checking for potential hardcoded credentials..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' -g '!*.d.ts' -e '[0-9a-f]{32}' -e '[0-9a-f]{16}' tests/
Length of output: 3062
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for environment variable loading patterns
echo "Checking for environment variable loading patterns..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' -A 5 'process\.env' tests/
# Check for any potential .env files
echo "Checking for .env files..."
fd -g '.env*' -t f
# Check for test configuration files
echo "Checking for test configuration files..."
fd -g '*config*' -g '*setup*' tests/
Length of output: 33719
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential credential leaks in setup files
echo "Checking setup files for potential credential leaks..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' -g '*.json' -g '*.sh' -e 'VONAGE.*=|FB_APP.*=' tests/
# Check for environment loading patterns
echo "Checking environment loading patterns..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' 'dotenv|loadEnv|config\(' tests/
Length of output: 641
tests/pw/tests/e2e/coupons.spec.ts (1)
43-45: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify test alignment with feature permissions
The test case has been activated, but there seems to be an inconsistency with the feature map changes mentioned in the summary where admin's ability to add marketplace coupons is set to false.
Consider enhancing the test with additional assertions to verify:
- The coupon was created successfully
- The coupon appears in the marketplace coupon list
- The coupon has the correct settings
test('admin can add marketplace coupon', { tag: ['@pro', '@admin'] }, async () => {
- await admin.addMarketplaceCoupon({ ...data.coupon, title: data.coupon.couponTitle() });
+ const couponTitle = data.coupon.couponTitle();
+ await admin.addMarketplaceCoupon({ ...data.coupon, title: couponTitle });
+ // Verify coupon creation
+ await admin.expectCouponToExist(couponTitle);
+ // Verify coupon settings
+ await admin.expectCouponSettings(couponTitle, data.coupon);
});tests/pw/pages/couponsPage.ts (1)
23-23: Consider a more robust solution for handling the WooCommerce header.
The current approach of hiding the header via CSS manipulation in tests is a workaround that could mask underlying UI issues. While it solves the immediate problem, it might hide potential integration issues between Dokan and WooCommerce.
Consider these alternatives:
- Add a proper configuration option in WooCommerce to disable the header during tests
- Use proper test isolation techniques like intercepting and mocking WooCommerce responses
- Create an integration test configuration that handles such UI elements globally
Let's verify if this is a widespread issue:
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the proper implementation of WooCommerce header handling in tests?
tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-140: Overall test structure looks good!
The new tests maintain consistency with the existing test patterns and are well-organized within the file structure. The tests are properly tagged and follow the established naming conventions (except for the minor issues noted above).
tests/pw/tests/e2e/_env.setup.ts (1)
111-113: LGTM! The test setup follows established patterns.
The implementation correctly disables the WooCommerce task list reminder bar by setting the appropriate option value. The test case is well-placed within the WooCommerce settings setup block and properly tagged for the lite test suite.
tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts (2)
362-392: LGTM! Well-structured SMS verification settings implementation.
The method is well-implemented with comprehensive validation checks and proper verification of saved values.
454-454: LGTM! Comment updated correctly.
The comment has been appropriately updated from "Live Search Settings" to "quote Settings".
tests/pw/utils/interfaces.ts (2)
1619-1630: LGTM! Verify integration with Facebook API settings.
The social API interface is well-structured and includes all necessary fields for Facebook integration.
Let's verify the Facebook API settings usage:
✅ Verification successful
Facebook API settings integration is properly implemented and verified
The verification confirms that:
- Facebook app ID and secret are correctly defined in environment types
- Test data properly implements the interface using environment variables
- Settings page handles Facebook API credentials consistently
- Selectors are properly defined for form interactions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Facebook API integration usage
# Test: Search for Facebook API related code. Expect: Consistent usage of app ID and secret.
# Look for Facebook API related configurations
rg -l "FB_APP"
Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage of Facebook API settings in the test files
# Check the test data implementation
rg -A 5 "FB_APP" tests/pw/utils/testData.ts
# Check the environment type definitions
rg -A 5 "FB_APP" tests/pw/types/environment.d.ts
# Look for any social API related test implementations
rg -i "socialapi" tests/pw/utils/testData.ts
# Check for any Facebook-related configurations in the entire codebase
rg -i "facebook.*app(id|secret)"
Length of output: 1316
1700-1714: LGTM! Verify integration with Vonage SMS gateway settings.
The SMS gateway interface is properly structured with all required fields for Vonage integration.
Let's verify the Vonage API settings usage:
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for more specific Vonage-related code to verify the integration.
Vonage SMS gateway integration is properly implemented and verified
The verification shows that:
- The Vonage API integration is properly implemented in the test suite with environment variables
VONAGE_API_KEYandVONAGE_API_SECRET - The SMS gateway settings page correctly handles Vonage configuration with proper input fields and validation
- The implementation includes complete test coverage for setting and verifying Vonage gateway settings
- The interface matches the actual implementation in the test files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Vonage API integration usage
# Test: Search for Vonage API related code. Expect: Consistent usage of API key and secret.
# Look for Vonage API related configurations
rg -l "VONAGE_API"
Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Vonage-related code patterns
rg -i "vonage" -A 5
# Search for SMS gateway implementation patterns
rg -i "smsgateway|sms.gateway" -A 5
Length of output: 13569
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (4)
480-482: LGTM: New admin settings capabilities are well-structured.
The new capabilities for colors, vendor verification, SMS gateways, and social API settings are logically placed within the admin settings section and align with the PR's objective of enhancing admin settings tests.
Also applies to: 486-486
508-508: LGTM: Import dummy data capability added.
Adding the capability to import dummy data is beneficial for testing scenarios and aligns with the testing focus of this PR.
601-601: LGTM: Vendor bulk action capability for product reviews.
The addition of bulk action capability for product reviews enhances vendor workflow efficiency.
Line range hint 1-1000: Verify test coverage for new capabilities.
While the feature flags are properly defined, we should ensure comprehensive test coverage exists for these new capabilities.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that test coverage exists for all the key capabilities I was verifying:
- Admin settings tests are covered in multiple files including
tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.tsand related verification tests - Dummy data import is tested in
tests/pw/tests/e2e/tools.spec.tsandtests/pw/tests/api/dummyData.spec.ts - Product review bulk actions are tested in
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productReviews.spec.ts
Let me verify the actual test implementations to ensure they provide adequate coverage:
Let me check the settings tests since they weren't visible in the previous output:
Based on the comprehensive test coverage evidence found in the codebase:
- Admin settings tests are thoroughly implemented in
tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.tscovering all new capabilities including colors settings, vendor verification, SMS gateways, and social API - Dummy data import/clear functionality is properly tested in
tests/pw/tests/e2e/tools.spec.tswith both API and UI tests - Product review bulk actions are tested in
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productReviews.spec.ts
All new capabilities have proper test coverage
The test implementations show:
- End-to-end tests covering UI interactions
- API tests for backend functionality
- Proper test organization with before/after hooks
- Comprehensive assertions and verifications
- Both positive and negative test scenarios
- Clear test descriptions and proper tagging
No additional test coverage is needed for the new capabilities listed in the feature map.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for corresponding test files for new capabilities
# Look for test files related to new admin settings
echo "Checking for admin settings test files..."
rg -l "colors settings|vendor verification|sms gateways|social api" tests/
# Look for test files related to dummy data import
echo "Checking for dummy data import test files..."
rg -l "import dummy data" tests/
# Look for test files related to product review bulk actions
echo "Checking for product review bulk actions test files..."
rg -l "bulk action.*product review" tests/
Length of output: 1083
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual test implementations
echo "=== Settings Tests ==="
rg -A 5 "describe.*settings" tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts
echo -e "\n=== Tools/Dummy Data Tests ==="
rg -A 5 "dummy data" tests/pw/tests/e2e/tools.spec.ts
echo -e "\n=== Product Review Tests ==="
rg -A 5 "bulk action" tests/pw/tests/e2e/productReviews.spec.ts
Length of output: 1067
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get more detailed view of settings tests
echo "=== Settings Tests (full file) ==="
cat tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts
echo -e "\n=== Settings Page Implementation ==="
cat tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts
Length of output: 45514
tests/pw/utils/testData.ts (1)
2224-2233: LGTM! Social API settings are well-structured.
The social API configuration is properly implemented with:
- Clear section organization
- Proper use of environment variables
- Consistent success message pattern
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/pw/.env.example (1)
9-10: Fix spelling inconsistency in placeholder value.
The environment variable LICENSE_KEY uses American spelling (LICENSE) while its placeholder value uses British spelling (licence). Maintain consistency by using the same spelling.
-LICENSE_KEY=licence_key [Dokan License key]
+LICENSE_KEY=license_key [Dokan License key]tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (1)
2352-2382: Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the social API selectors.
While the social API selectors are well organized, adding JSDoc comments would improve code maintainability by documenting the purpose and expected usage of each selector group.
Example:
+ /**
+ * Social API selectors for managing social login integrations
+ */
socialApi: {
+ /** Main toggle for enabling/disabling social login */
enableSocialLogin: '//label[@for="dokan_social_api[enabled]"]//label[@class="switch tips"]',
+ /** Platform-specific enable/disable toggles */
enableSocialApi: (platform: string) => `//div[@class="${platform}_details dokan-settings-field-type-social"]//label[@class="switch tips"]`,
// ... rest of the selectors
}📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- tests/pw/.env.example (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/pw/.env.example (2)
15-16: Consider adding format hints for Facebook credentials.
The Facebook integration variables look good, but consider adding format hints in the comments to help developers understand the expected value format (e.g., numeric ID for FB_APP_ID).
-FB_APP_ID=facebook_app_id [Facebook App ID]
-FB_APP_SECRET=facebook_app_secret [Facebook App secret]
+FB_APP_ID=facebook_app_id [Facebook App ID - numeric value]
+FB_APP_SECRET=facebook_app_secret [Facebook App secret - alphanumeric string]Let's also verify these variables are used in the social API settings tests.
✅ Verification successful
Format hints for Facebook credentials added and test coverage verified
The Facebook integration variables are properly used in the test files. The variables are imported in tests/pw/utils/testData.ts and used in test data configuration. Adding format hints will improve clarity:
-FB_APP_ID=facebook_app_id [Facebook App ID]
-FB_APP_SECRET=facebook_app_secret [Facebook App secret]
+FB_APP_ID=facebook_app_id [Facebook App ID - numeric value, e.g., 123456789]
+FB_APP_SECRET=facebook_app_secret [Facebook App secret - alphanumeric string, e.g., abc123def456ghi789]🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Facebook API variables are used in tests
# Expected: Find test files using these environment variables
rg "FB_APP" tests/pw/
Length of output: 369
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage in testData.ts to understand the context better
cat tests/pw/utils/testData.ts
Length of output: 104927
13-14: Verify SMS settings test coverage.
The Vonage SMS integration variables look good. Let's verify they are used in the SMS settings tests.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check if these variables are actually used in SMS-related test cases.
Let me check the SMS settings tests to verify if these variables are properly used.
Let me check the SMS verification gateway settings implementation to ensure these variables are properly used.
Let me check the selectors and the complete implementation of the SMS verification settings.
Vonage SMS integration variables are properly used in tests
The variables VONAGE_API_KEY and VONAGE_API_SECRET are correctly integrated and used in the test suite:
- Variables are defined in environment types (
tests/pw/types/environment.d.ts) - Variables are imported in test data (
tests/pw/utils/testData.ts) - Variables are used in SMS verification gateway settings test implementation (
tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts) - Proper selectors are defined for the API inputs (
tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Vonage SMS variables are used in tests
# Expected: Find test files using these environment variables
rg "VONAGE_API" tests/pw/
Length of output: 401
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SMS test files and their content
rg -l "sms" tests/pw/ | xargs rg -l "test|describe|it"
# Then get content of the test data file to understand the context
cat tests/pw/utils/testData.ts
Length of output: 105195
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SMS-related test files and their content
rg -l "sms" tests/pw/tests/
cat tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts
Length of output: 6525
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check SMS verification gateway settings implementation
cat tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts | rg -A 10 "setDokanSMSVerificationGatewaysSettings"
Length of output: 1115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check SMS verification selectors and complete implementation
cat tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts | rg -A 20 "verificationSmsGateway"
cat tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts | rg -A 20 "setDokanSMSVerificationGatewaysSettings"
Length of output: 5083
tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts (2)
362-392: LGTM! Well-structured SMS gateway configuration implementation.
The implementation includes comprehensive configuration options, proper validation checks, and thorough state verification after saving changes.
454-454: LGTM! Comment updated correctly.
The comment has been appropriately updated from "Live Search Settings" to "quote Settings".
tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (1)
2318-2324: LGTM! The SMS verification gateway selectors are well organized.
The selectors follow a consistent naming pattern and provide good coverage of the SMS verification gateway settings functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts (2)
362-392: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for API key validation.
The implementation is thorough and follows the established patterns. The method includes comprehensive validation checks for all form fields and state changes.
Consider adding a try-catch block around the Vonage API key validation to handle potential API validation failures:
// vonage
await this.toBeVisible(settingsAdmin.verificationSmsGateway.vonage.apiKey);
+try {
await this.clearAndType(settingsAdmin.verificationSmsGateway.vonage.apiKey, verificationSmsGateways.vonage.apiKey);
await this.clearAndType(settingsAdmin.verificationSmsGateway.vonage.apiSecret, verificationSmsGateways.vonage.apiSecret);
+} catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to validate Vonage API credentials:', error);
+ throw error;
+}409-426: LGTM! Consider adding a TODO for future social platforms.
The implementation is clean and follows the established patterns. The structure is well-organized with clear separation between general and platform-specific settings.
Consider adding a TODO comment to indicate potential future platform additions:
// Facebook
+// TODO: Add support for additional social platforms (Twitter, Google, etc.)
await this.enableSwitcher(settingsAdmin.socialApi.enableSocialApi(socialApi.platform));📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts (1)
454-454: LGTM! Comment accurately reflects the method's purpose.
The comment update correctly aligns with the method's functionality.
* Add live search tests * Add widget api methods * Fix widger dbdata * Fix: e2e coverage issue * Add Admin settings tests (getdokan#2422) * Add admin settings tests * Fix a flaky test * Fix pr reviews * Fix pr reviews * Fix pr reviews
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests