Add new tests & update flaky tests #2365
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request encompasses a series of modifications across various test files and utility classes. Key changes include enhancements to filtering mechanisms, navigation methods, and the addition of new test scripts for improved testing capabilities. The updates also involve refining existing methods, improving visibility checks, and adjusting the handling of product-related actions. Additionally, several interface properties have been expanded for better clarity, and the overall structure of test data has been organized for improved usability. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UI
participant API
participant Database
User->>UI: Interact with product filter
UI->>API: Send filter request
API->>Database: Query filtered results
Database-->>API: Return filtered results
API-->>UI: Display filtered results
UI-->>User: Show updated product list
Tip Announcements
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (37)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
Additional context usedBiome
Additional comments not posted (71)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
tests/pw/pages/vendorBookingPage.ts (1)
298-298: Inconsistent URL endpoint usage detected.The new URL endpoint
data.subUrls.frontend.bookedDayBlockeshas been added, but the old endpointdata.subUrls.frontend.vDashboard.addBookingis still present in multiple locations within thevendorBookingPage.tsfile. This inconsistency could lead to potential issues in the booking functionality. Please review and update the usage of the old endpoint to ensure consistency and correctness.
data.subUrls.frontend.vDashboard.addBookingis still used in several places invendorBookingPage.ts.Analysis chain
URL endpoint update.
The change in the URL endpoint from
data.subUrls.frontend.vDashboard.addBookingtodata.subUrls.frontend.bookedDayBlockesis approved.However, ensure that this change is thoroughly tested to confirm that it behaves as expected and does not break the booking functionality.
Run the following script to verify the booking functionality:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the booking functionality after the URL endpoint update. # Test: Search for the usage of the new URL endpoint. Expect: Only occurrences of the new endpoint. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'data.subUrls.frontend.bookedDayBlockes' # Test: Search for the usage of the old URL endpoint. Expect: No occurrences of the old endpoint. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'data.subUrls.frontend.vDashboard.addBooking'Length of output: 208
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the booking functionality after the URL endpoint update. # Test: Search for the usage of the new URL endpoint. Expect: Only occurrences of the new endpoint. rg -A 5 'data.subUrls.frontend.bookedDayBlockes' # Test: Search for the usage of the old URL endpoint. Expect: No occurrences of the old endpoint. rg -A 5 'data.subUrls.frontend.vDashboard.addBooking'Length of output: 2786
tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (2)
336-336: Add line range for the code segment.The code segment for the
filteredResultselector is missing the line range in the review comment. Please add the line range to clearly specify the location of the selector within the file.
6740-6741: Correct the typo in the selector name.The selector name
calanderLoadercontains a typo. It should becalendarLoaderinstead. Please update the selector name to fix the typo and improve code readability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (37)
- tests/pw/e2e.config.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/package.json (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/abuseReportsPage.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/announcementsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts (8 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/customerPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/privacyPolicyPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/productAdvertisingPage.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/productQAPage.ts (10 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/productReviewsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/requestForQuotationsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (12 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/sellerBadgesPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/singleProductPage.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/singleStorePage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/spmvPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/storeReviewsPage.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/storesPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/vendorBookingPage.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/vendorPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/vendorSubscriptionsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/vendorVerificationsPage.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/wholesaleCustomersPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/withdrawsPage.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/coupons.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/plugin.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productAdvertising.spec.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productQA.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorBooking.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorVerifications.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/apiUtils.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/interfaces.ts (13 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/testData.ts (14 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- tests/pw/e2e.config.ts
- tests/pw/pages/privacyPolicyPage.ts
- tests/pw/pages/singleStorePage.ts
- tests/pw/pages/vendorPage.ts
- tests/pw/pages/vendorSubscriptionsPage.ts
- tests/pw/pages/wholesaleCustomersPage.ts
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/coupons.spec.ts
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/plugin.spec.ts
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorBooking.spec.ts
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorVerifications.spec.ts
Additional context used
Biome
tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts
[error] 590-590: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Additional comments not posted (71)
tests/pw/package.json (2)
14-14: LGTM!The
test:env:setupscript is approved. It enhances the testing capabilities by allowing for a more structured setup process for the testing environment.
15-15: LGTM!The
test:site:resetscript is approved. It facilitates better management of test scenarios by allowing for a structured reset process for the testing environment.tests/pw/pages/productReviewsPage.ts (1)
67-67: LGTM!The change is approved. It enhances the reliability of the test by preventing flakiness that could arise from the row actions being hidden during the execution of the hover and click operations that follow.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productAdvertising.spec.ts (4)
Line range hint
1-1: LGTM!The removal of the
productNamevariable from the scope of the test suite is approved. It enhances the clarity of the test by ensuring thatproductNameis only instantiated when required, thereby reducing its scope and potential for unintended side effects.
Line range hint
16-22: LGTM!The changes in the
beforeAllhook are approved. The omission of the assignment toproductNameenhances the clarity of the test by making the variable's lifecycle more explicit and localized.
37-38: LGTM!The changes in the test case for adding a product advertisement are approved. Creating the product name directly within the test case enhances the clarity of the test by making the variable's lifecycle more explicit and localized.
54-55: LGTM!The changes in the test case for expiring an advertised product are approved. Creating a new product advertisement within the test itself not only updates the logic for how advertised products are handled but also ensures that the correct product is referenced when expiring an advertisement.
tests/pw/pages/abuseReportsPage.ts (1)
49-49: LGTM!The changes to the
filterAbuseReportsfunction are approved. The updates improve the filtering functionality and user experience.Key improvements:
- Navigation method updated to
gotofor streamlined code.- Filtering logic refined to use
clickAndWaitForResponsewithfilteredResultfor better responsiveness and accuracy.- Clear filter action added to enhance user experience.
Also applies to: 59-59, 65-65, 73-75
tests/pw/pages/singleProductPage.ts (2)
24-24: LGTM!The addition of
productAddedSuccessMessageandproductWithQuantityAddedSuccessMessageto the destructured object is approved. This change enhances the information available for rendering or processing on the page.
66-67: LGTM!The modification of the visibility check for the product location elements is approved. The change ensures that the test remains reliable despite external factors affecting the product location's visibility.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/settings.spec.ts (1)
59-61: LGTM!The addition of the new test case "admin can set Dokan menu manager settings" is approved. This test case enhances the test coverage for the admin functionalities related to menu management and is seamlessly integrated into the existing test suite.
tests/pw/pages/storeReviewsPage.ts (2)
33-33: LGTM!The change to include
filteredResultin the destructuring ofstoreReviewsAdmin.filtersis approved. This change likely enhances how filtered results are processed and displayed, allowing for more dynamic interaction with the filtered results in the UI.
106-111: LGTM!Encapsulating the logic for selecting all items within a new asynchronous function,
toPass, is approved. This change introduces a conditional check that ensures the bulk action is only applied when appropriate, thereby improving the robustness of the bulk actions feature.tests/pw/tests/e2e/productQA.spec.ts (1)
76-77: LGTM!Capturing the answer created in the
createProductQuestionAnswerfunction call and passing both thequestionIdand the newly capturedanswerto thedeleteAnswerfunction is approved. This change enhances the test's accuracy by ensuring that the correct answer is being deleted, reflecting a more realistic scenario in the testing process.tests/pw/pages/productAdvertisingPage.ts (2)
60-60: LGTM!Replacing the
goIfNotTheremethod withgotoin theaddNewProductAdvertisementmethod is approved. This change simplifies the navigation logic by directly navigating to the specified URL without the conditional check thatgoIfNotTherepresumably performed. The overall functionality of adding a new product advertisement remains intact.
83-83: LGTM!Replacing the
goIfNotTheremethod withgotoin thesearchAdvertisedProductmethod is approved. This change simplifies the navigation logic by directly navigating to the specified URL without the conditional check thatgoIfNotTherepresumably performed. The overall functionality of searching for an advertised product remains intact.tests/pw/pages/announcementsPage.ts (1)
76-76: LGTM!The added visibility check for the announcement cell is a good enhancement to the
editAnnouncementmethod. It ensures that the UI element is present and interactable before proceeding with the hover and click actions, thereby improving the robustness of the editing process.tests/pw/pages/spmvPage.ts (1)
117-117: Verify the impact of the URL endpoint change.The URL endpoint used in the
clickAndWaitForResponseAndLoadStatefunction call has been changed fromdata.subUrls.frontend.vDashboard.productstodata.subUrls.ajax.Please ensure that this change is thoroughly tested to confirm that it behaves as expected and does not introduce any unintended side effects or break the product cloning functionality.
Run the following script to verify the URL endpoint change:
tests/pw/pages/withdrawsPage.ts (2)
36-36: LGTM!The addition of
filteredResultin the destructured variables ofwithdrawsAdmin.filtersis a good enhancement to the filtering functionality. It allows the class to utilizefilteredResultin subsequent operations, potentially improving the filtering mechanism.
56-56: LGTM!The change from
pressAndWaitForResponsewithdata.key.entertoclickAndWaitForResponsewithwithdrawsAdmin.filters.filteredResult(input)is a good improvement to the filtering functionality within the 'by-vendor' case.This adjustment suggests a shift from simulating a keyboard action to directly invoking a method that likely processes the filtered results, potentially leading to a more efficient and accurate filtering operation.
tests/pw/pages/sellerBadgesPage.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM!The removal of
expectfrom the import statement is approved. It does not affect the functionality of the code.tests/pw/pages/vendorBookingPage.ts (2)
291-291: Streamlined user interaction.The change from keyboard interactions to a direct click on the search result corresponding to the customer's name is approved. It streamlines the user interaction and makes it more intuitive.
308-309: Enhanced navigation logic.The change from
gototogotoUntilNetworkidleand the addition of a check to ensure that a calendar loader is not visible are approved. These changes enhance the navigation logic to ensure that the page has fully loaded and all network requests have settled before proceeding. They also ensure that the application is in a stable state before further actions are taken.tests/pw/pages/productQAPage.ts (11)
22-24: New method for navigation.The addition of the
goToProductQAmethod is approved. It encapsulates the navigation logic, making it easier to manage and modify in the future.
26-28: New method for navigation.The addition of the
goToQuestionDetailsmethod is approved. It encapsulates the navigation logic, making it easier to manage and modify in the future.
34-34: Improved readability and centralized navigation logic.The replacement of a direct call to
goIfNotTherewith the newly introducedgoToProductQAmethod is approved. It improves readability and centralizes the navigation logic.
56-56: Improved readability and centralized navigation logic.The replacement of a direct call to
goIfNotTherewith the newly introducedgoToQuestionDetailsmethod is approved. It improves readability and centralizes the navigation logic.
79-79: Improved readability and centralized navigation logic.The replacement of a direct call to
goIfNotTherewith the newly introducedgoToProductQAmethod is approved. It improves readability and centralizes the navigation logic.
105-111: Improved readability, centralized navigation logic, and enhanced reliability.The replacement of a direct call to
goIfNotTherewith the newly introducedgoToQuestionDetailsmethod and the replacement ofawait this.wait(1)with a more robust handling of asynchronous operations usingtoPassare approved. These changes improve readability, centralize the navigation logic, and enhance the reliability of the tests by reducing flakiness associated with timing issues.
117-117: Improved readability and centralized navigation logic.The replacement of a direct call to
goIfNotTherewith the newly introducedgoToQuestionDetailsmethod is approved. It improves readability and centralizes the navigation logic.
127-129: Improved readability, centralized navigation logic, and enhanced reliability.The replacement of a direct call to
goIfNotTherewith the newly introducedgoToQuestionDetailsmethod and the replacement ofawait this.wait(1)with a more robust handling of asynchronous operations usingtoBeVisibleare approved. These changes improve readability, centralize the navigation logic, and enhance the reliability of the tests by reducing flakiness associated with timing issues.
138-153: Improved readability, centralized navigation logic, and enhanced reliability.The replacement of direct calls to
goIfNotTherewith the newly introducedgoToQuestionDetailsmethod and the replacement ofawait this.wait(1)with a more robust handling of asynchronous operations usingtoPassare approved. These changes improve readability, centralize the navigation logic, and enhance the reliability of the tests by reducing flakiness associated with timing issues.
159-161: Improved reliability, readability, and centralized navigation logic.The modification of the
deleteAnswermethod to accept an additional parameter,answer, which is used to check for the presence of the answer text before proceeding with the deletion, and the replacement of a direct call togoIfNotTherewith the newly introducedgoToQuestionDetailsmethod are approved. These changes improve the reliability of the tests by ensuring that the answer text is present before proceeding with the deletion. They also improve readability and centralize the navigation logic.
169-169: Improved readability and centralized navigation logic.The replacement of a direct call to
goIfNotTherewith the newly introducedgoToQuestionDetailsmethod is approved. It improves readability and centralizes the navigation logic.tests/pw/utils/helpers.ts (1)
65-66: LGTM!The changes to the
stringBetweenTagsfunction look good:
- Using
matchwith a more general regular expression makes the function more versatile and able to handle various input strings.- Returning an empty string when no match is found is safer than potentially returning
undefined.The code changes are approved.
tests/pw/pages/vendorVerificationsPage.ts (1)
152-153: LGTM!The addition of resetting previous filters before applying new ones in the
filterVerificationRequestsfunction is a good improvement:
- It ensures a clean state before applying new filters.
- It avoids any unintended filtering behavior caused by previous filters.
The code changes are approved.
tests/pw/pages/storesPage.ts (1)
1-1: Verify the impact of removing theexpectimport on the tests.The import statement for the
expectfunction from@playwright/testhas been removed. This change suggests a potential shift in the testing strategy or a refactoring of how assertions are handled within the tests defined in this file.Please ensure that:
- The removal of the
expectimport does not break any existing tests in this file.- If assertions are now being handled differently, the new approach is consistently applied throughout the file.
- If
expectis no longer necessary, all its usages have been removed from the test cases.To verify the impact of removing the
expectimport, you can run the following script:If the tests pass without any issues and there are no remaining usages of
expectin the file, then the removal of the import statement is safe. Otherwise, please investigate and fix any broken tests or inconsistencies in how assertions are handled.Verification successful
Removal of
expectimport is safe.The
expectfunction is not used in thetests/pw/pages/storesPage.tsfile, so its import can be safely removed without impacting the tests.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: # Verify that removing the `expect` import does not break any tests in this file. # Test 1: Search for usages of `expect` in this file. # Expect: No occurrences of `expect` (ignoring the import statement). rg --type typescript -g '!import' -w 'expect' tests/pw/pages/storesPage.ts # Test 2: Run the tests defined in this file. # Expect: All tests pass without any issues related to missing `expect`. npm run test:pw tests/pw/pages/storesPage.test.tsLength of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of `expect` in the file, excluding import statements. rg -w 'expect' tests/pw/pages/storesPage.tsLength of output: 43
tests/pw/pages/requestForQuotationsPage.ts (3)
210-210: LGTM!The visibility check for the quote cell is a good practice to ensure the element is present before interacting with it. This helps prevent potential errors.
217-217: LGTM!The visibility check for the quote cell is a good practice to ensure the element is present before interacting with it. This helps prevent potential errors.
224-224: LGTM!The visibility check for the quote cell is a good practice to ensure the element is present before interacting with it. This helps prevent potential errors.
tests/pw/pages/customerPage.ts (2)
232-232: LGTM!The change enhances the specificity of the success message displayed to the user when no quantity is specified. It improves the user experience by providing clearer feedback on the action taken.
234-234: LGTM!The change enhances the specificity of the success message displayed to the user when a quantity is provided. It improves the user experience by providing clearer feedback on the action taken, reflecting the quantity of the product added to the cart.
tests/pw/pages/settingsPage.ts (2)
111-111: LGTM!The modification to the
setDokanSellingSettingsmethod to utilize the newgoToSingleDokanSettingsmethod streamlines the process of accessing selling options. It improves the consistency and maintainability of the code by utilizing the new method across the codebase.
271-311: LGTM!The new
setDokanMenuManagerSettingsmethod enhances the functionality of theSettingsPageclass by providing a convenient way to manage Dokan menu settings. It improves the automation of menu configuration by iterating over a predefined list of options and enabling them programmatically.The verification step ensures that the changes are successfully applied by checking the background color of the switchers, adding robustness to the configuration process.
tests/pw/utils/interfaces.ts (1)
Line range hint
1415-1495: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty to various sections within thedokanSettingsinterface enhances the structure by providing a title or label for each respective section. This improves clarity and usability without altering existing functionality.Also applies to: 1499-1507, 1515-1522, 1529-1536, 1544-1583, 1591-1600, 1607-1613, 1628-1637, 1650-1657, 1667-1677
tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (3)
484-484: Improved reliability by forcing visibility of row actions.The change to the
goToProductEditmethod, which forces the visibility of row actions by removing a specific class from the product vendor's row actions element, aims to mitigate flakiness in the UI tests. This ensures that the necessary elements are visible before interaction, enhancing the reliability of the test.
570-570: Expanded destructuring to handle additional product addition messages.The expansion of the
productDetailsdestructuring in themultipleElementVisiblemethod to includeproductAddedSuccessMessageandproductWithQuantityAddedSuccessMessagesuggests that the UI now handles additional messages related to product addition. These properties may be relevant for user feedback or assertions in the tests.
677-685: Enhanced reliability of enabling wholesale price option.The refactoring of the
addProductWholesaleOptionsmethod to include a new asynchronous function improves the method's reliability. The function checks the visibility of the wholesale price option and enables it if not visible. This conditional check ensures that the necessary UI elements are present before proceeding with further actions. The added assertion to confirm the visibility of the option strengthens the test's validation logic.tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts (4)
587-591: Improved element manipulation and validation with new methods.The addition of new methods like
setElementCssStyle,checkIfNotChecked, and methods for retrieving selected values and text from select elements enhances the functionality of theBasePageclass. These methods provide more robust ways to interact with and validate web elements, improving the overall usability of the class.Also applies to: 745-749, 770-776, 823-842, 1414-1417, 1425-1426, 1435-1436, 1459-1465
Tools
Biome
[error] 590-590: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
1425-1426: More flexible assertions with updated methods.The updates to existing methods like
toBeCheckedandtoContainTextto accept additional options allow for more flexible assertions. These changes enhance the assertion capabilities of theBasePageclass, providing more control over the validation process.Also applies to: 1435-1436
1459-1465: Strengthened validation with new assertion method.The addition of the
toHaveSelectedValueassertion method strengthens the validation capabilities of theBasePageclass for select elements. This method allows for verifying that a select element has a specific value, improving the robustness of the test assertions.
590-590: False positive: Assignment in expression is intentional.The static analysis hint flagging the assignment in the expression on line 590 appears to be a false positive. In this context, the assignment is intentional and does not introduce confusion or side effects. The use of the assignment is clear and does not negatively impact the readability or maintainability of the code.
Tools
Biome
[error] 590-590: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
tests/pw/utils/apiUtils.ts (2)
1367-1371: LGTM!The changes to the
createProductQuestionmethod look good:
- The return type has been updated to include the question text as an additional string in the returned tuple.
- The question text is correctly extracted from the
responseBodyand returned.This improves the utility of the method by providing more information about the created product question.
1394-1398: Looks good!The changes to the
createProductQuestionAnswermethod are approved:
- The return type now includes the processed answer text as an additional string in the returned tuple.
- The
stringBetweenTagshelper function is used to correctly extract the relevant part of the answer text from theresponseBody.Returning the processed answer text improves the utility of this method.
tests/pw/utils/testData.ts (14)
922-922: LGTM!The addition of the
bookedDayBlockesproperty to thedataexport looks good. It provides a URL for retrieving booked day blocks, which will be useful for testing booking-related functionality.
1441-1441: LGTM!The modification of the
lastnameproperty in thecustomerobject from'ln'to'c1'is approved. It simplifies the test customer's last name without causing any problems.
1442-1442: LGTM!The addition of the
fullnameproperty to thecustomerobject is approved. It provides a convenient way to access the full name of the test customer by concatenating theCUSTOMERenvironment variable with the last name'c1'. This enhances the test data without causing any problems.
1443-1443: LGTM!The addition of the
customerobject is approved. It provides a convenient way to access the email address of the test customer by concatenating theCUSTOMERenvironment variable with the email domain'@email.com'. This enhances the test data without causing any problems.
1888-1888: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'General Settings'to thegeneralobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the general settings section, improving the organization of the test data.
1899-1899: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'Selling Option Settings'to thesellingobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the selling options settings section, improving the organization of the test data.
1912-1912: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'Withdraw Settings'to thewithdrawobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the withdraw settings section, improving the organization of the test data.
1936-1936: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'Reverse Withdrawal Settings'to thereverseWithdrawobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the reverse withdrawal settings section, improving the organization of the test data.
1945-1945: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'Site and Store Page Settings'to thepageobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the site and store page settings section, improving the organization of the test data.
1955-1955: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'Appearance Settings'to theappearanceobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the appearance settings section, improving the organization of the test data.
1966-1966: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'Menu Manager Settings'to themenuManagerobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the menu manager settings section, improving the organization of the test data.
1972-1972: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'Privacy Settings'to theprivacyPolicyobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the privacy settings section, improving the organization of the test data.
1980-1980: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'Colors Settings'to thecolorsobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the colors settings section, improving the organization of the test data.
2048-2048: LGTM!The addition of the
settingTitleproperty with the value'Shipping Status Settings'to theshippingStatusobject indokanSettingsis approved. It provides a clear and accurate title for the shipping status settings section, improving the organization of the test data.tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (3)
1738-1738: LGTM!The
verificationRequestCellselector looks good and should correctly locate the table cell containing the specifiedrequestId. The line range is also specified accurately.
6835-6835: LGTM!The
productAddedSuccessMessageselector looks good and should correctly locate the success message containing the specifiedproductNameafter adding a product to the cart. The line range is also specified accurately.
6836-6836: LGTM!The
productWithQuantityAddedSuccessMessageselector looks good and should correctly locate the success message containing the specifiedproductNameandquantityafter adding a product to the cart. The line range is also specified accurately.
shashwatahalder01
changed the title
shashwatahalder01
added
QA approved
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores