Implementation of TOMAS in GCHP #164
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR supersedes #145. |
This was referenced Nov 11, 2022
…piling The MSG variable was defined twice in HCOX_TOMAS_Jeagle_Run. The second occurrence has been removed, along with an unused ERR variable. Signed-off-by: Melissa Sulprizio <[email protected]>
There were an excessive amount of trailing whitespaces in hcox_tomas_jeagle_mod.F90 that affected readability of the file. These have now been removed. Signed-off-by: Melissa Sulprizio <[email protected]>
msulprizio
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2023
msulprizio
added a commit
to geoschem/GCClassic
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2023
For more details see - geoschem/geos-chem#1378 - geoschem/HEMCO#164 Signed-off-by: Melissa Sulprizio <[email protected]>
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the PR adding TOMAS simulations in GCHP. It supersedes #145 originally from @BettyCroft. This PR should be merged along with:
I have test run the merge on a single node simulation, and it's completed successfully.