-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add multithreading support to Multi* geometries #1265
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you also update the doc comment about the multithreading
feature flag in geo/lib.rs
? To mention these new features functionality, and/or indicate it's not just for rstar
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[cfg(feature = "multithreading")] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The consuming into
implementation makes sense to me.
And I can see how the ref and mut flavors below provide necessary non-consuming functionality. But what does it look like to use it? Can you include some example code in your PR that uses these new methods to make the new interface easier to evaluate?
My guess is that you'd need to do something like
(& my_multi_line_string).into_par_iter()
and
(&mut my_multi_line_string).into_par_iter()
?
Which is a bit rough. I'm afraid people will just end up my_multi_line_string.clone().into_par_iter()
out of confusion.
Would it get better if we got rid of these two ref/mut implementations and instead implemented rayon::IntoParallelRefIterator
and rayon::IntoParallelRefMutIterator
which seem purpose built for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm. These work with the current impls:
#[test]
fn test_multithreading_linestring() {
let multi: MultiLineString<i32> = wkt! {
MULTILINESTRING((0 0,2 0,1 2,0 0), (10 10,12 10,11 12,10 10))
};
let mut multimut: MultiLineString<i32> = wkt! {
MULTILINESTRING((0 0,2 0,1 2,0 0), (10 10,12 10,11 12,10 10))
};
let _ = multi.par_iter().for_each(|_p| ());
let _ = multimut.par_iter_mut().for_each(|_p| ());
let _ = &multi.into_par_iter().for_each(|_p| ());
let _ = &mut multimut.par_iter_mut().for_each(|_p| ());
}
I admittedly didn't see the rayon::IntoParallelRefIterator
and just adapted our existing iterators to rayon::IntoParallelIterator
, but I'm confused by
This trait is automatically implemented for I where &I: IntoParallelIterator. In most cases, users will want to implement IntoParallelIterator rather than implement this trait directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh splendid! They're already implemented by the blanket impl!
I'm glad that users will be able to do:
let _ = multi.par_iter().for_each(|_p| ());
let _ = multimut.par_iter_mut().for_each(|_p| ());
vs. the slightly more arcane:
let _ = &multi.into_par_iter().for_each(|_p| ());
let _ = &mut multimut.into_par_iter().for_each(|_p| ());
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yeah the latter two were just to make sure "everything" worked. Thanks for the sanity check!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Feature flags LGTM!
CHANGES.md
if knowledge of this change could be valuable to users.I think I've set up the Cargo features correctly – the
multithreading
feature is disabled by default ingeo-types
, but enabled bygeo
whengeo
's default features are active. I just want to make sure the othergeo-types
default features aren't impacted.Closes #1257.
This PR should merge before #1246.